Back

Mind the Gap: An Embedding Guide to Safely Travel in Sequence Space

Wu, A.; Trolliet, Q.; Rajendran, A.; Lala, J.; Angioletti-Uberti, S.

2025-07-03 synthetic biology
10.1101/2025.06.19.660524 bioRxiv
Show abstract

We present a hybrid approach combining a protein language model (pLM) with Monte Carlo (MC) sampling for generating enzyme mutants free of mutations deleterious for structural preservation. Given the amino acid sequence of the original enzyme and a set of residues for which the local environment should be conserved, i.e., the catalytic site, our approach generates mutants that differ vastly in the overall sequence while retaining the geometry of the conserved region, thereby representing promising candidates for further experimental screening. Unlike end-to-end deep learning approaches, whose results are harder to interpret and control, the use of a well-established, classic technique such as MC sampling allows us to easily interpret the generative process as the sampling of an energy landscape determined by the pLM. In turn, such an interpretation enables us to steer this generative process and control its outcome by making use of robust statistical mechanics concepts, e.g., temperature, thereby explicitly guaranteeing certain properties of the generated mutants. Given the increasing relevance of generative algorithms in the design and search for novel, optimised enzymes, we believe that our results constitute an important step for the future development of this class of techniques. To facilitate experimental verification, we finally provide hundreds of sequences for 13 different enzymes involved in catalytic processes ranging from carbon dioxide conversion to DNA replication.

Published in PLOS Computational Biology (predicted rank #6) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.