Back

A Genetically Based Latitudinal Gradient in Aggressiveness of Root-Knot Nematode Populations on Tomato with the Mi-1 Resistance Gene

Groen, S. C.; Godinez-Vidal, D.; Franco-Navarro, F.; Edwards, S.; Ploeg, A. T.

2025-06-24 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2025.06.18.660456 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Tomato is a food crop of global importance, with a large proportion of processing tomatoes produced in California. One of the main problems plaguing tomato production is infection by populations of root-knot nematodes (RKNs; Meloidogyne spp.) that can evade or suppress ( break) resistance mediated by the Mi-1 gene, which has been introgressed into most processing tomato cultivars. In this study, we evaluate fourteen Meloidogyne spp. populations collected from fields across the state of California that can complete their life cycle on Mi-1 tomato cultivars. One of these populations was identified as M. javanica and the others as M. incognita. All RKN populations developed and reproduced on Mi-1 tomato cultivar Celebrity. Although we did not observe differences in gall index among populations when studied together in greenhouse conditions, significant quantitative variation in reproduction factor values was apparent among them. Several pathogens and parasites display geographical gradients in aggressiveness and we identified a negative correlation between populations latitudes-of-origin and reproduction factors. This suggests that populations of these thermophilic RKN species from lower latitudes tended to have evolved higher levels of aggressiveness on Mi-1 tomato, which may be linked to warmer temperatures throughout the year. Finally, populations with relatively low reproduction factor values still showed significant differences in the phenotypes of the galls they induced. Our results showed that Meloidogyne populations evolved genetic variation in aggressiveness along a latitudinal gradient in Californian processing tomato agroecosystems, which may have implications for managing these important crop pests.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.