Back

Comparative microbiome analyses reveal differences between wild populations and captive groups of the Montseny Brook Newt (Calotriton arnoldi)

Tulloch, S. A.; Estarellas, M.; Adams, D. C.; Bonacolta, A.; Pagone, V.; Fernandez-Guiberteau, D.; Amat, F.; Montori, A.; Carbonell, F.; Obon, E.; Alonso, M.; Santmartin, M.; Xarles, J.; Marsol, R.; Guinart, D.; Solorzano, S.; Talavera, A.; Burriel-Carranza, B.; Bosch, E.; del Campo, J.; Carranza, S.

2025-06-18 microbiology
10.1101/2025.06.18.660306 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The Montseny brook newt, Calotriton arnoldi, is a Critically Endangered amphibian species endemic to the Montseny Massif in Catalonia, Northeastern Spain. Due to population declines and threats to its natural habitat, an ex-situ breeding program was initiated in 2007. A key goal of the program is to ensure the survival of captive-bred individuals after reintroduction, which in amphibians heavily relies on the specimens microbiome being capable of protecting them from environmental microorganisms, especially considering the global Chytridiomycosis pandemic caused by the fungi Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) and Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans (Bsal). This study aims to characterize the microbiome of wild and captive specimens of Calotriton arnoldi, to identify differences in microbiome composition, and to determine their potential impact on captive-bred individuals upon reintroduction. Up to 7,438 ASVs (Amplicon Sequence Variants) were identified from 138 samples from 21 and 61 wild and captive-bred individuals, respectively. Results indicate that wild populations from different subspecies have significantly different microbiome composition, as do wild and captive-bred groups from the same subspecies. Additionally, dissimilarities in microbiome variability were only found within each subspecies, between wild and captive-bred groups. In terms of composition, certain bacteria were identified as potential markers for both wild and captive environments. Enhancing microbiome variability might improve the survival prospects of reintroduced specimens. Thus, exposing captive specimens to a more natural environment while in captivity or a soft-release procedure could potentially mitigate the absence of exposure to other bacteria and potential pathogens from their native environment.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Animal Microbiome
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.7%
2
Microbial Ecology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.1%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 24%
6.8%
4
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
5.6%
5
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.6%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
8
The ISME Journal
228 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
9
Environmental Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
10
Microbiome
154 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
11
Microorganisms
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
12
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
13
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
14
Environmental Microbiome
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
16
BMC Microbiology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
17
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
54 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
19
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
20
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
21
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
22
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.9%
23
Molecular Ecology Resources
171 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
25
Malaria Journal
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
26
ISME Communications
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
Biological Invasions
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
28
Aquaculture
31 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
29
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
30
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.6%