Developing Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for Maternity Care in Australia: A Study Protocol
Spark, L. C.; Schlage, K.; Callander, E. J.; Leefhelm, E.; Hobday, M. B.; Wakgari, N.; Bradfield, Z.
Show abstract
BackgroundWith some of the lowest global perinatal mortality rates, Australia is one of the safest countries to give birth. Despite impressive outcomes in clinical care, the prevalence of birth trauma, mistreatment and disrespect in maternity care has been the subject of much scrutiny. There are no nationally standardized reporting measures to indicate whether care provided during the critical and transformative period of childbearing meets the health and wellbeing needs of those giving birth. Recent reviews of maternity Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) worldwide indicate current tools are of poor quality and lack consumer co-design. This protocol describes the first phase of the Measuring what Matters to Australian Mothers (MMAMs) study, to develop consumer co-designed PREMs and PROMs for maternity care in Australia. MethodsA four-step multi-methods approach will be adopted for tool development. (i) A rapid literature review and thematic synthesis of existing maternity PREMs and PROMs tools will inform mapping of domains, dimensions and items across the maternity care continuum to develop a conceptual survey framework. (ii) Multiple rounds of iterative consultation with expert maternity care consumers and maternity healthcare and policy experts will refine the conceptual framework. (iii) A three-round modified e-Delphi study will be undertaken with a minimum n=50 maternity care consumers and n=50 health professionals to identify the priority items for inclusion in a maternity care PREM and PROM. (iv) Cognitive focus group interviews with maternity care consumers will assess the PREM and PROM tools for overall relevance, comprehensibility, and comprehensiveness. This approach will result in a draft set of PREMs and PROMs that will be piloted and validated across a nationally representative sample of maternity care consumers in Australia in phase two of the MMAMs study. DiscussionThis study will develop world-first consumer co-designed maternity care PREMs and PROMs. Following tool development outlined here, piloting, psychometric validation, and implementation planning phases will be undertaken. These tools will provide practical, brief and broad indicators of health quality, enabling benchmarking and improvements in the value and quality of person-centered maternity care at an individual, service and system level across Australia.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Ethnicity and COVID-19 outcomes among healthcare workers in the United Kingdom: UK-REACH ethico-legal research, qualitative research on healthcare workers’ experiences, and stakeholder engagement protocol 96%
- Implementation Science Protocol for a participatory, theory-informed implementation research programme in the context of health system strengthening in sub-Saharan Africa (ASSET-ImplementER) 95%
- A collaborative maternity and newborn dashboard (CoMaND) for the COVID-19 pandemic: a protocol for timely, adaptive monitoring of perinatal outcomes in Melbourne, Australia 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Process of Use of Evidence Products by Frontline Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Staff at the Facility Level in Ghana. 95%
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 95%
- Artificial Intelligence for Contextual Well-being: Protocol for an Exploratory Sequential Mixed Methods Study with Medical Students as a Social Microcosm 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- What are the mechanisms of effect of group antenatal care? A systematic realist review and synthesis of the literature 94%
- Women’s knowledge, attitudes and views of preconception health and intervention delivery methods: A cross-sectional survey 94%
- Giving birth in a Pandemic: Women’s Birth Experiences in England during COVID-19 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A qualitative study investigating the acceptability of cervical screening and self-sampling in postnatal women at 6-week postnatal check-up 94%
- Development and psychometric testing of EPAT-16: A short and valid measure for patient-centeredness from the patient’s perspective 92%
- Trauma informed co-production: Collaborating and combining expertise to improve access to primary care with women with complex needs 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Family-centered postnatal training and adherence to newborn care practices in district hospitals in two Indian states: A quasi-experimental intervention study 95%
- Improving local authority financial support services for users with complex health needs: a mixed-method economic evaluation of Social Navigators in South Tyneside, UK 93%
- Evaluating the impact of an enhanced support implementation of the PReCePT (PRevention of Cerebral palsy in Pre-Term labour) quality improvement toolkit to increase the uptake of magnesium sulphate in pre-term deliveries for the prevention of neurodisabilities: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.