An Open-Source Generalizable Deep Learning Framework for Automated Corneal Segmentation in Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging
Kandakji, L.; Liu, S.; Balal, S.; Moghul, I.; Allan, B.; Tuft, S.; Gore, D.; Pontikos, N.
Show abstract
PurposeTo develop a deep learning model - Cornea nnU-Net Extractor (CUNEX) - for full-thickness corneal segmentation of anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) images and evaluate its utility in artificial intelligence (AI) research. MethodsWe trained and evaluated CUNEX using nnU-Net on 600 AS-OCT images (CSO MS-39) from 300 patients: 100 normal, 100 keratoconus (KC), and 100 Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) eyes. To assess generalizability, we externally validated CUNEX on 1,168 AS-OCT images from an infectious keratitis dataset acquired from a different device (Casia SS-1000). We benchmarked CUNEX against two recent models, CorneaNet and ScLNet. We then applied CUNEX to our dataset of 194,599 scans from 37,499 patients as preprocessing for a classification model evaluating whether segmentation improves AI prediction, including age, sex, and disease staging (KC and FECD). ResultsCUNEX achieved Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and intersection over union (IoU) scores ranging from 94-95% and 90-99%, respectively, across healthy, KC, and FECD eyes. This was similar to ScLNet (within 3%) but better than CorneaNet (8-35% lower). On external validation, CUNEX maintained high performance (DSC 83%; IoU 71%) while ScLNet (DSC 14%; IoU 8%) and CorneaNet (DSC 16%; IoU 9%) failed to generalize. Unexpectedly, segmentation minimally impacted classification accuracy except for sex prediction, where accuracy dropped from 81 to 68%, suggesting sex-related features may lie outside the cornea. ConclusionCUNEX delivers the first open-source generalizable corneal segmentation model using the latest framework, supporting its use in clinical analysis and AI workflows across diseases and imaging platforms. It is available at https://github.com/lkandakji/CUNEX.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Current applications of artificial intelligence for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy: a systematic review 96%
- Reliability of retinal pathology quantification in age-related macular degeneration: Implications for clinical trials and machine learning applications 95%
- Visible light optical coherence tomography of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer reflectivity in glaucoma 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Autonomous screening for Diabetic Macular Edema using deep learning processing of retinal images 96%
- Artificial intelligence to facilitate clinical trial recruitment in age-related macular degeneration 94%
- Quantification of Fundus Autofluorescence Features in a Molecularly Characterized Cohort of More Than 3500 Inherited Retinal Disease Patients from the United Kingdom 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Detecting Glaucoma Worsening Using Optical Coherence Tomography Derived Visual Field Estimates 96%
- Circular functional analysis of OCT data for precise identification of structural phenotypes in the eye 95%
- Modeling rod and cone photoreceptor cell survival in vivo using optical coherence tomography 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated Expert-level Scleral Spur Detection and Quantitative Biometric Analysis on the ANTERION Anterior Segment OCT System 97%
- Macula structural and vascular differences in glaucoma eyes with and without high axial myopia 94%
- Autonomous Screening for Laser Photocoagulation in Fundus Images Using Deep Learning 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Dense Optic Nerve Head Deformation Estimated using CNN as a Structural Biomarker of Glaucoma Progression 95%
- Evaluation of OCT biomarker changes in treatment-naive neovascular AMD using a deep semantic segmentation algorithm 95%
- An Open-Source Dataset Of Anti-Vegf Therapy In Diabetic Macular Oedema Patients Over Four Years & Their Visual Outcomes 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.