Clinicogenomic landscape and function of PIK3CA, AKT1, and PTEN mutations in breast cancer
Tao, J. J.; Sisoudiya, S.; Tukachinsky, H.; Schrock, A.; Sivakumar, S.; Sokol, E. S.; Vasan, N.
Show abstract
PurposeTo comprehensively characterize the clinical and genomic landscapes of PIK3CA, AKT1, and PTEN alterations and examine their functional implications in AKT-driven breast cancer. Experimental DesignComprehensive genomic profiling of 51,767 breast tumors was performed with FoundationOne(R)CDx or FoundationOne(R). We examined the genomic landscape of PIK3CA, PTEN, and AKT1 alterations and their distribution across clinical variables of interest. Prior deep mutational scanning (DMS) data was used to functionally characterize clinical PTEN variants. ResultsThere were 29,157 total variants across PIK3CA, AKT1, and PTEN, including pathogenic variants and VUS. The most frequently altered gene was PIK3CA (37.4% of cases), followed by PTEN (13.5%), then AKT1 (5.4%). The most common alterations in each gene were PIK3CA H1047R (35.6% of PIK3CA-altered cases), E545K (19.7%), and E542K (11.7%); AKT1 E17K (69.7%); and PTEN homozygous copy number deletion (37.3%). PIK3CA alterations were less prevalent in patients of African genetic ancestry (27.1% vs 38.6% in European genetic ancestry), while AKT1 and PTEN alterations were balanced across ancestries. PIK3CA, AKT1, and PTEN pathogenic alterations were all mutually exclusive to each other. Using available DMS data on missense PTEN mutations, we found that 32.5% showed discordant effects on protein stability and phosphatase activity, underscoring the need for functional validation beyond predicted loss-of-function. ConclusionsHere we present the landscape of PIK3CA, AKT1, and PTEN alterations in the largest clinical cohort examined to date. The functional implications of lesser-known variants in each gene warrant further investigation by tools such as deep mutational scanning.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- RNA Sequencing-Based Single Sample Predictors of Molecular Subtype and Risk of Recurrence for Clinical Assessment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer 96%
- The clinical and molecular significance associated with STING signaling in estrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer 95%
- The breast pre-cancer atlas illustrates the molecular and micro-environmental diversity of ductal carcinoma in situ 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mutational landscape of pure ductal carcinoma in situ and associations with disease prognosis and response to radiotherapy 96%
- Integrative multi-omic sequencing reveals the MMTV-Myc mouse model mimics human breast cancer heterogeneity 96%
- Acquired mutations and transcriptional remodeling in long-term estrogen-deprived locoregional breast cancer recurrences 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinicogenomic characterization of inflammatory breast cancer 97%
- Acquired FGFR and FGF alterations confer resistance to estrogen receptor (ER) targeted therapy in ER+ metastatic breast cancer 93%
- Tamoxifen Response at Single Cell Resolution in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Primary Human Breast Tumors 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Kinome focused CRISPR-Cas9 screens in African ancestry patient-derived breast cancer organoids identifies essential kinases and synergy of EGFR and FGFR1 inhibition. 94%
- Acquired RAD51C promoter methylation loss causes PARP inhibitor resistance in high grade serous ovarian carcinoma 93%
- Biomarker-guided treatment strategies for ovarian cancer identified from a heterogeneous panel of patient-derived tumor xenografts 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Whole-genome analysis of Nigerian patients with breast cancer reveals ethnic-driven somatic evolution and distinct genomic subtypes 96%
- Mismatch repair deficiency predicts response to HER2 blockade in HER2-negative breast cancer 95%
- Identifying therapeutic targets for cancer: 2,094 circulating proteins and risk of nine cancers 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.