Back

Clinicogenomic landscape and function of PIK3CA, AKT1, and PTEN mutations in breast cancer

Tao, J. J.; Sisoudiya, S.; Tukachinsky, H.; Schrock, A.; Sivakumar, S.; Sokol, E. S.; Vasan, N.

2025-06-18 oncology
10.1101/2025.06.18.25329632 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeTo comprehensively characterize the clinical and genomic landscapes of PIK3CA, AKT1, and PTEN alterations and examine their functional implications in AKT-driven breast cancer. Experimental DesignComprehensive genomic profiling of 51,767 breast tumors was performed with FoundationOne(R)CDx or FoundationOne(R). We examined the genomic landscape of PIK3CA, PTEN, and AKT1 alterations and their distribution across clinical variables of interest. Prior deep mutational scanning (DMS) data was used to functionally characterize clinical PTEN variants. ResultsThere were 29,157 total variants across PIK3CA, AKT1, and PTEN, including pathogenic variants and VUS. The most frequently altered gene was PIK3CA (37.4% of cases), followed by PTEN (13.5%), then AKT1 (5.4%). The most common alterations in each gene were PIK3CA H1047R (35.6% of PIK3CA-altered cases), E545K (19.7%), and E542K (11.7%); AKT1 E17K (69.7%); and PTEN homozygous copy number deletion (37.3%). PIK3CA alterations were less prevalent in patients of African genetic ancestry (27.1% vs 38.6% in European genetic ancestry), while AKT1 and PTEN alterations were balanced across ancestries. PIK3CA, AKT1, and PTEN pathogenic alterations were all mutually exclusive to each other. Using available DMS data on missense PTEN mutations, we found that 32.5% showed discordant effects on protein stability and phosphatase activity, underscoring the need for functional validation beyond predicted loss-of-function. ConclusionsHere we present the landscape of PIK3CA, AKT1, and PTEN alterations in the largest clinical cohort examined to date. The functional implications of lesser-known variants in each gene warrant further investigation by tools such as deep mutational scanning.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.8%
2
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
16.8%
3
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.8%
4
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
6
npj Breast Cancer
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
7
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.8%
8
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.4%
9
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.9%
10
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
11
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 52%
2.0%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.6%
14
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
15
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.6%
16
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.6%
17
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
20
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
23
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
25
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%