Back

The contribution of vestibular and proprioceptive signals to trunk stabilization varies between postural tasks and between walking speeds.

Li, Y. C.; Bruijn, S. M.; Lemaire, K. K.; Brumagne, S.; van Dieen, J. H.

2025-06-17 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.06.17.657409 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Stabilizing the upright posture of the trunk relies on vestibular and proprioceptive afference. Previous studies found that the feedback responses to sensory afference vary between postures and tasks. We investigated whether and how vestibular and proprioceptive afference contribute to trunk stabilization during different postural tasks, and during walking at different speeds. Twelve healthy adults performed tasks in a random order: sitting, standing on the right foot or both feet, and treadmill walking at five speeds: 0.8, 2.0, 3.2, 4.3 and 5.5 km/h, while exposed to unilateral muscle vibration on the right paraspinal muscles at the level of the second lumbar vertebra, or to a step-like electrical vestibular stimulation (EVS) with the anode behind the left ear. The mediolateral displacements of markers at the sixth thoracic level and sacrum in the global coordinate system were used to evaluate the responses to sensory stimulation. No significant responses to EVS at T6 and sacrum level were found in sitting and standing. Responses to muscle vibration were significant and differed between unipedal standing compared to sitting and bipedal standing. The latter suggests a different interpretation of the sensation of muscle lengthening in these postures. During walking, the magnitude of the responses to both stimuli increased from very slow speeds to moderate speeds. From moderate to higher speeds, responses to muscle vibration decreased, whereas responses to EVS plateaued. These findings suggest speed-dependent modulation of vestibular and proprioceptive contributions in trunk stabilization during walking. Summary statementBy applying electrical vestibular stimulation and muscle vibration, we found that how vestibular and proprioceptive signals are used for trunk stabilization differs between postural tasks and walking speeds.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.7%
2
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
3
Experimental Physiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.9%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.3%
6
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
7
Human Movement Science
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
9
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
10
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
11
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
12
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
13
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
14
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.1%
16
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
17
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
20
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
21
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.0%
22
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
23
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
25
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
26
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
27
European Journal of Applied Physiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
28
The Cerebellum
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
29
Gait & Posture
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
30
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%