Back

Comparison of Intramuscular Pharmacological Treatment Options for Acute Agitation: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

Thiriveedhi, A. S.; Chang, J.

2025-06-18 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2025.06.17.25329649
Show abstract

ObjectiveAcute agitation in psychiatric settings presents significant clinical and safety challenges. Pharmacological management is often necessary when de-escalation strategies fail, but optimal medication regimens remain unclear. This study evaluates the safety, efficacy, and adverse event profiles of commonly used intramuscular (IM) pharmacologic regimens for acute agitation in a multicenter cohort. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using de-identified data extracted from the HCA Healthcare corporate database. Adult psychiatric patients who received PRN intramuscular medications for acute agitation were included. Patients were stratified into four treatment groups based on administered medication: (1) haloperidol monotherapy, (2) haloperidol + lorazepam, (3) haloperidol + diphenhydramine, and (4) haloperidol + lorazepam + diphenhydramine. Outcomes assessed included frequency of PRN use, benztropine administration, and incidence of hypotensive and hypoxic episodes. Generalized linear modeling was used for statistical analysis. ResultsThe combination regimen of haloperidol + lorazepam + diphenhydramine (Group 4) was associated with significantly higher odds of receiving multiple PRN administrations compared to haloperidol alone (Group 1). However, this regimen, along with the diphenhydramine-inclusive group (Group 3), was linked to a significantly lower likelihood of requiring benztropine, suggesting a reduction in extrapyramidal symptom burden. No statistically significant group differences were observed in hypotensive or hypoxic episodes. ConclusionTriple-agent regimens may be associated with increased treatment intensity but offer benefits in reducing extrapyramidal symptoms without increasing cardiovascular or respiratory risk. These findings support the thoughtful use of combination IM regimens, particularly those including diphenhydramine, in the management of acute agitation in psychiatric settings.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 36%
13.5%
2
Psychiatry Research
based on 33 papers
Top 0.1%
11.4%
3
BMC Psychiatry
based on 20 papers
Top 0.1%
11.3%
4
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
based on 10 papers
Top 0.1%
5.4%
5
Frontiers in Psychiatry
based on 56 papers
Top 2%
5.1%
6
Journal of Affective Disorders
based on 72 papers
Top 3%
3.0%
7
Translational Psychiatry
based on 94 papers
Top 4%
3.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
BMJ Mental Health
based on 15 papers
Top 0.5%
2.5%
9
PLOS Medicine
based on 95 papers
Top 5%
2.5%
10
Psychological Medicine
based on 52 papers
Top 4%
2.4%
11
Journal of Psychiatric Research
based on 22 papers
Top 1%
1.9%
12
The British Journal of Psychiatry
based on 21 papers
Top 2%
1.8%
13
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
based on 11 papers
Top 0.7%
1.6%
14
Schizophrenia Research
based on 11 papers
Top 0.7%
1.6%
15
European Neuropsychopharmacology
based on 11 papers
Top 0.7%
1.6%
16
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 44%
1.3%
17
Journal of Medical Internet Research
based on 81 papers
Top 11%
1.3%
18
Neuropsychopharmacology
based on 29 papers
Top 2%
1.3%
19
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 77%
1.3%
20
Schizophrenia Bulletin
based on 21 papers
Top 1%
1.3%
21
JAMA Psychiatry
based on 11 papers
Top 0.7%
1.2%
22
American Journal of Psychiatry
based on 14 papers
Top 1%
1.2%
23
BJPsych Open
based on 24 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
based on 26 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Neurology
based on 74 papers
Top 11%
0.8%
26
Schizophrenia
based on 13 papers
Top 1%
0.8%
27
JMIR Formative Research
based on 31 papers
Top 7%
0.7%
28
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 21%
0.7%
29
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 25%
0.7%