A multi-dimensional framework for establishing and managing a genomic newborn screening program
Schnabel-Besson, E.; Dikow, N.; Alex, K.; Muetze, U.; Straub, H.; Doll, E. S.; Mahal, J.; Brennenstuhl, H.; Mayer, C. J.; Neth, L.; Hagedorn, T.; Hoegl, H.; Settegast, S.; Ditzen, B.; Mueller-Terpitz, R.; Koelker, S.; Schaaf, C. P.; Winkler, E.
Show abstract
PurposeNewborn screening (NBS) is an effective measure of secondary prevention. The application of genomic sequencing in population-based screening would enable further expansions of the NBS disease panel and a genomic NBS (gNBS). The selection of NBS target diseases is still based on the Wilson and Jungner screening criteria from 1968, which are considered incomplete, rendering the necessity of developing new criteria. MethodsThe present work aims to establish a multi-dimensional framework for future gNBS programs. An interdisciplinary expert panel comprising researchers from pediatric and adolescent medicine, human genetics, ethics, medical psychology, law, and patient representatives used a nominal group technique-like multi-stage consensus process to define criteria for gNBS, considering ethical, legal, and social implications, medical aspects, and patient perspectives. ResultsOverall, 18 criteria were developed, clustered into four subcategories: I. Clinical criteria (characteristics of the target disease); II. Diagnostic criteria (requirements of the test); III. Therapeutic-interventional criteria (prerequisites of the intervention); IV. Program management criteria (requirements of the program). Subcategories I-III define selection criteria for target diseases, subcategory IV defines criteria for how to establish and manage the program. ConclusionThis multi-dimensional framework serves as a well-balanced basis for developing thoroughly revised and internationally accepted consensus screening criteria.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Systematic assessment of outcomes following a genetic diagnosis identified through a large-scale research study into developmental disorders 93%
- Comprehensive phenotyping of 3q29 deletion syndrome: recommendations for clinical care 93%
- Towards robust clinical genome interpretation: developing a consistent terminology to characterize disease-gene relationships - allelic requirement, inheritance modes and disease mechanisms 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A step forward, but still inadequate: Australian health professionals’ views on the genetics and life insurance moratorium 91%
- Disease-specific variant interpretation highlighted the genetic findings in 2325 Japanese patients with retinitis pigmentosa and allied diseases 91%
- Exome sequencing as a first-tier test for copy number variant detection : retrospective evaluation and prospective screening in 2418 cases 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Returning Actionable Genomic Results in a Research Biobank: Analytic Validity, Clinical Implementation and Resource Utilization 93%
- Consensus guidelines for eligibility assessment of pathogenic variants to antisense oligonucleotide treatments 92%
- Exome copy number variant detection, analysis and classification in a large cohort of families with undiagnosed rare genetic disease 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Defining the Critical Educational Components of Informed Consent for Genetic Testing: Views of US-Based Genetic Counselors and Medical Geneticists 92%
- BCL11A intellectual developmental disorder: defining the clinical spectrum and genotype-phenotype correlations 91%
- Re-evaluation and Re-analysis of 152 research exomes five years after the initial report reveals clinically relevant changes in 20% 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of DNA-poli: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial to assess a digital platform for family cascade genetic testing and predictive genetic counselling 90%
- Genetic Diagnosis of Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy Type 1 Using Rare Variant Linkage Analysis and Long Read Genome Sequencing 90%
- 3-hour genome sequencing and targeted analysis to rapidly assess genetic risk 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.