Back

Biocompatible PVDF Nanofibers with Embedded Magnetite Nanodiscs Enable Wireless Magnetoelectric Neuromodulation

Signorelli, L.; Wolters, A.; Duran Toro, V.; Kocar, E.; Wasner, F.; Goldenstein, N. I.; Englhard, J.; Shojaei Baghini, M.; Heidari, H.; Bachmann, J.; Hescham, S. A.; Gregurec, D.

2025-06-21 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.06.16.660052 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Wireless neuromodulation technologies aim to eliminate the need for invasive hardware and enhance tissue compatibility. Magnetoelectric (ME) materials enable magnetic field-induced electrical stimulation, offering a minimally invasive neural activation. However, conventional ME systems use rigid ceramic components with limited biocompatibility. Here, we report a flexible, predominantly organic ME platform composed of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) nanofibers embedded with anisotropic magnetite nanodiscs (MNDs). These MNDs were selected for their unique ability to exert magnetic torque due to vortex magnetization, and their intrinsic magnetostrictive behaviour. The resulting ME fibers preserve the piezoelectric {beta}-phase of PVDF and exhibit magnetoelectric voltage coefficient of 1.26 Vcm-{superscript 1}Oe-{superscript 1}. We compare two magnetic activation strategies; torque-based and high-frequency magnetostriction, finding that magnetostriction more effectively triggers neuronal responses. In vitro calcium imaging reveals robust activation in primary cortical neurons cultured on ME fibers. Biocompatibility post-stimulation was confirmed on ex vivo human brain tissue, with no increased cell death. Implanted into the premotor cortex of freely moving mice, the fibers enabled wireless modulation of motor behaviour under an alternating magnetic field. This work presents the first demonstration of wireless magnetoelectric neuromodulation using soft, biocompatible fiber composites, paving the way for future bioelectronic interfaces free from rigid components and tethered systems. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=182 SRC="FIGDIR/small/660052v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (41K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@7868e7org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@12f32a7org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1a6a7e4org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@5876e4_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.5%
2
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.9%
3
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.6%
5
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 3%
5.0%
6
Advanced Materials Technologies
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
7
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
9
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
10
Small
70 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
11
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
13
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
14
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
15
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
16
Nanoscale
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
17
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.8%
19
Nanoscale Advances
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
20
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 43%
0.8%
22
Nature Nanotechnology
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Materials Today Bio
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
24
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
25
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 80%
0.5%