Back

Exploring Mycobacterium tuberculosis rRNA Transcriptomic Signatures asResponse to Anti-TB Treatment in Whole Blood RNA-seq Data

Lopez-Exposito, P.; Calvet Seral, J.; Ferrer, S.; Mendoza-Losana, A.; M. Gordaliza, P.; Vaquero, J. J.

2025-06-19 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.06.16.659901 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Current clinical tools for monitoring tuberculosis (TB) treatment response rely mostly on sputum culture and chest X-ray, which are unreliable in patients with low bacterial loads and lack the desirable promptness. There is a need for biomarkers able to provide earlier and more accurate insights into pathogen viability and response to therapy. We analyzed publicly available whole-blood RNA-seq data from 79 TB patients sampled at diagnosis, and weeks 1, 4, and 24 of standard anti-TB treatment. After aligning human reads and filtering, remaining reads were mapped to the Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv genome to quantify rRNA subunit transcripts (16S, 23S, 5S, ITS1, ITS2). Microbiome profiles were assessed using Kraken2/Bracken, with alpha/beta diversity analyses and differential abundance (ANCOM-BC2). 16S and 23S rRNA transcripts were consistently detected across all treatment times, with 23S reads dominating in diagnosis and early stages of treatment shifting toward a significant predominance of 16S reads at week 24. 5S and ITS1 were inconsistently detected, whereas ITS2 was undetectable. Alpha diversity (Shannon index) increased during treatment (significant at weeks 1 and 4), while beta diversity showed significant shifts over time despite no significant differences in total M. tuberculosis abundance. Our findings suggest that it may be feasible to detect M. tuberculosis rRNA signatures in blood RNA-seq and suggest dynamic transcriptomic changes during treatment. The 16S/23S ratio and minor rRNA units may serve as complementary biomarkers for treatment monitoring and other transcriptomic-based biomarkers. Future work should validate these findings in larger cohorts using optimized RNA-seq protocols focusing on the pathogen.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 2%
15.1%
2
Tuberculosis
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
3
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.0%
4
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.0%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.0%
6
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.0%
7
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
9
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.7%
10
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.0%
11
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
BMC Microbiology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
15
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
16
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
17
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
19
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
20
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
22
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.0%
23
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
25
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.7%
26
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
28
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
29
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
Malaria Journal
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%