SARS-CoV-2 ORF8 sequence conservation and mutational analysis -- insight into the influence of dataset size on identifying top mutations
Kandwal, S.; Cmelo, I.; Fayne, D.
Show abstract
Given how quickly the SARS-CoV-2 virus mutates, the COVID-19 pandemic has been a major source of concern. The ORF8 accessory protein is one such protein, which is reported to have undergone many mutations. This makes ORF8 an intriguing protein to investigate how these mutations might play a role in overall ORF8 activity. In this study, we have performed conservation and mutational analysis on SARS-CoV- 2 ORF8 protein sequences to identify the conserved and mutated residues. We have also split the ORF8 sequence data into SARS-CoV-2 variant datasets to further identify top mutations across each of them. The mutated and conserved residues were visualised on the available structure of ORF8 to highlight the conserved and mutated sites, which might hold some biological significance. Finally, our study also investigated the significance of sequence dataset size in capturing top mutations following multiple sequence alignments. Author SummaryThe COVID-19 pandemic was caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which is known to change over time, i.e., it gets mutated, resulting in the generation of different variants. The ORF8 accessory protein of the SARS-CoV- 2 genome is known to undergo these changes more frequently. In our study, we used SARS-CoV-2 ORF8 protein sequences from various variants to identify mutations among them. Furthermore, we have discovered sites that remain unchanged over time, a phenomenon known as conservation. We think that these unchanged and changed sites could be important for biology and studying them will help in understanding the underlying mechanism of how ORF8 interacts with partner proteins based on existing experimental data. Lastly, we have looked at how much sequence data is sufficient for identifying the top mutated sites. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=105 SRC="FIGDIR/small/659836v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (43K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@14bde1org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1be1770org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@f4cb5eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@153acb6_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- SARS-CoV-2 NSP14 governs mutational instability and assists in making new SARS-CoV-2 variants 95%
- MACI: A machine learning-based approach to identify drug classes of antibiotic resistance genes from metagenomic data 93%
- L-shape distribution of the relative substitution rate (c micro) observed for SARS-COV-2 genome, inconsistent with the selectionist theory, the neutral theory and the nearly neutral theory but a near-neutral balanced selection theory: implication on neutralist-selectionist debate 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- An Issue of Concern: Unique Truncated ORF8 Protein Variants of SARS-CoV-2 96%
- Identification of novel mutations in RNA-dependent RNA polymerases of SARS-CoV-2 and their implications on its protein structure 94%
- Prediction of antiviral drugs against African Swine Fever Viruses based on protein-protein interaction analysis 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.