Back

The Global Economic Burden of Schizophrenia: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

Imre, A.; Meszaros, A.; Nemeth, B.; Nagy, B.; Jozwiak-Hagymasy, J.; Cecere, G.; Homan, P.; Sommer, I. E. C.; Babarczy, B.

2025-06-13 health economics
10.1101/2025.06.13.25329410 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundExisting studies on the economic impact of schizophrenia are fragmented and vary in methodology, hindering an ample understanding of the total economic burden. AimsTo quantify the global economic burden of schizophrenia by synthesizing findings from systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and to assess variations by cost category, world region and income level. MethodWe conducted a protocol-driven umbrella review registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024504092). A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and APA PsycINFO identified reviews reporting annual per-patient monetary cost estimates for schizophrenia. Monetary values were adjusted for inflation and converted to 2024 US dollars. ResultsTwenty-six systematic reviews involving 152 primary studies were included. The median annual per-patient total cost of schizophrenia was $33,236 (mean $47,872), with direct costs accounting for $23,126 (medical: $19,543; ancillary: $1,152) and indirect costs for $21,333. Costs were varied by income level: in high-income countries, the median total cost was $34,175, compared to $3,345 in upper-middle-income and $3,452 in lower-middle-income countries. Regional disparities were substantial, with Europe & Central Asia reporting the highest median costs among high-income settings. Data from low- and middle-income regions were limited or absent. Methodological heterogeneity, lack of standardization in cost reporting, and underrepresentation of low-resource settings limit generalizability. ConclusionsSchizophrenia poses a significant and unequally distributed global economic burden, driven by hospitalization, long-term care, and productivity losses. To support equitable policy and resource allocation, future research must adopt standardized costing frameworks and expand data collection into low-resource and understudied regions.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
42.1%
2
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.9%
50% of probability mass above
3
Schizophrenia Bulletin
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.2%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.7%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.2%
6
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
7
Schizophrenia Research
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
8
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
9
Schizophrenia
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
10
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
11
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
12
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
13
Addiction
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
14
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
15
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
36 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
16
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
17
JAMA Psychiatry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
18
The Lancet Healthy Longevity
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
19
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 74%
0.8%
21
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
24
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%