Deep-Learning Based Contrast Boosting Improves Lesion Visualization and Image Quality: A Multi-Center Multi-Reader Study on Clinical Performance with Standard Contrast Enhanced MRI of Brain Tumors
Pasumarthi, S.; Campbell Arnold, T.; Colombo, S.; Rudie, J. D.; Andre, J. B.; Elor, R.; Gulaka, P.; Shankaranarayanan, A.; Erb, G.; Zaharchuk, G.
Show abstract
BackgroundGadolinium-based Contrast Agents (GBCAs) are used in brain MRI exams to improve the visualization of pathology and improve the delineation of lesions. Higher doses of GBCAs can improve lesion sensitivity but involve substantial deviation from standard-of-care procedures and may have safety implications, particularly in the light of recent findings on gadolinium retention and deposition. PurposeTo evaluate the clinical performance of an FDA cleared deep-learning (DL) based contrast boosting algorithm in routine clinical brain MRI exams. MethodsA multi-center retrospective database of contrast-enhanced brain MRI images (obtained from April 2017 to December 2023) was used to evaluate a DL-based contrast boosting algorithm. Pre-contrast and standard post-contrast (SC) images were processed with the algorithm to obtain contrast boosted (CB) images. Quantitative performance of CB images in comparison to SC images was compared using contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), lesion-to-brain ratio (LBR) and contrast enhancement percentage (CEP). Three board-certified radiologists reviewed CB and SC images side-by-side for qualitative evaluation and rated them on a 4-point Likert scale for lesion contrast enhancement, border delineation, internal morphology, overall image quality, presence of artefacts, and changes in vessel conspicuity. The presence, cause, and severity of any false lesions was recorded. CB results were compared to SC using Wilcoxon signed rank test for statistical significance. ResultsBrain MRI images from 110 patients (47 {+/-} 22 years; 52 Females, 47 Males, 11 N/A) were evaluated. CB images had superior quantitative performance than SC images in terms of CNR (+634%), LBR (+70%) and CEP (+150%). In the qualitative assessment CB images showed better lesion visualization (3.73 vs 3.16) and had better image quality (3.55 vs 3.07). Readers were able to rule out all false lesions on CB by using SC for comparison. ConclusionsDeep learning based contrast boosting improves lesion visualization and image quality without increasing contrast dosage. Key ResultsO_LIIn a retrospective study of 110 patients, deep-learning based contrast boosted (CB) images showed better lesion visualization than standard post-contrast (SC) brain MRI images (3.73 vs 3.16; mean reader scores [4-point Likert scale]) C_LIO_LICB images had better overall image quality than SC images (3.55 vs 3.07) C_LIO_LIContrast-to-noise ratio, Lesion-to-brain Ratio and Contrast Enhancement Percentage for CB images were significantly higher than SC images (+729%, +88% and +165%; p < 0.001) C_LI Summary StatementDeep-learning based contrast boosting achieves better lesion visualization and overall image quality and provides more contrast information, without increasing the contrast dosage in contrast-enhanced brain MR protocols.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Image Downsampling Expedited Adaptive Least-squares (IDEAL) fitting improves intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) analysis in the human kidney 95%
- Prospective Motion Correction and Automatic Segmentation of Penetrating Arteries in Phase Contrast MRI at 7 T 95%
- Highly Accelerated Vessel-Selective Arterial Spin Labelling Angiography using Sparsity and Smoothness Constraints 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Phantom System Designed to Assess the Effects of Membrane Lipids on Water Proton Relaxation 95%
- Age and gender dependence of liver diffusion parameters and the evidence of intravoxel incoherent motion modelling of perfusion component is constrained by diffusion component. 94%
- Deep-Learning-Based Accelerated and Noise-Suppressed Estimation (DANSE) of quantitative Gradient Recalled Echo (qGRE) MRI metrics associated with Human Brain Neuronal Structure and Hemodynamic Properties 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Inconsistency of AI in Intracranial Aneurysm Detection with Varying Dose and Image Reconstruction 96%
- Does contrast-enhancement improve visualisation of lenticulostriate arteries in cerebral small vessel disease using time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography at 7 Tesla? 95%
- Developing a Fully Automated Imaging Biomarker for HCC Risk Assessment via MRI-Based Tumor Segmentation and EPM 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhancing Semantic Segmentation in Chest X-Ray Images through Image Preprocessing: ps-KDE for Pixel-wise Substitution by Kernel Density Estimation 94%
- Increased brain coverage and efficiency when measuring current-induced magnetic fields by use of simultaneous multi-slice echo-planar MRI 94%
- Freewater EstimatoR using iNtErpolated iniTialization (FERNET): Toward Accurate Estimation of Free Water in Peritumoral Region Using Single-Shell Diffusion MRI Data 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.