Back

Autopolyploidy exacerbates dominance masking under negative frequency-dependent selection: evidence from sporophytic self-incompatibility in Arabidopsis arenosa and A. lyrata

Vekemans, X.; Kolesnikova, U.; Vlcek, J.; Genete, M.; Dufour, A.; Welti, R.; Poux, C.; Castric, V.; Kolar, F.; Novikova, P. Y.

2025-06-17 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2025.06.11.659117 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Polyploidy is a widespread phenomenon in flowering plants, with up to 30% of extant species being recent polyploids. Whether and how polyploidy modulates the action of natural selection remains debated, and the particular case of balancing selection has been poorly explored. This study investigates the impact of autopolyploidy on sporophytic self-incompatibility in plants, a striking example of a genetic system evolving under a special form of balancing selection (strong negative frequency-dependent selection). Numerical simulations reveal that under strict codominance, the number of S-alleles maintained in tetraploid populations is expected to double as compared to diploid populations. However, under a model with strict hierarchical dominance among alleles, the number of S-alleles increases only slightly, but gene diversity and observed heterozygosity are substantially lower in tetraploids as compared to diploids, due to enhanced dominance masking effects. Empirical data on Arabidopsis arenosa and A. lyrata confirm the latter predictions, showing similar levels of allelic diversity but dramatically lower observed and expected heterozygosity at the self-incompatibility locus in tetraploids compared to diploids. The study highlights the significant impact of autopolyploidy on patterns of diversity at the self-incompatibility locus, emphasizing the increased dominance effect in tetraploids. The results also allow us to reject a scenario of strong founder effects associated with evolution of the polyploid lineages.

Published in Philosophical Transactions B · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.