Back

Prolonged cell encapsulation and rapid filamented light biofabrication of muscle constructs in microgravity

Winkelbauer, M.; Janiak, J.; Windisch, J.; Liu, H.; Bulatova, M.; Witzleben, M. W.; Oliveira, H.; Dani, S.; Richter, R. F.; L'Heureux, N.; Bar-Nur, O.; Gelinsky, M.; Zenobi, M.; Chansoria, P.

2025-06-17 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.06.11.659059 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The prospects of fabricating human tissue grafts or models using cell-laden bioresins in space has garnered significant interest in recent years. While there has been tremendous progress in extrusion or light-based bioprinting in microgravity conditions, printing of aligned tissues, such as those featuring anisotropic organization of cells and extracellular matrices (e.g., muscle, tendon, cardiac, etc.), remains a challenge. Furthermore, current photoresin formulations do not allow long-term cell encapsulation and are difficult to perform in microgravity. In this study, we demonstrate a new gravity-independent filamented light (G-FLight) biofabrication system with in-built refrigeration and heating units, which can create viable muscle constructs within seconds. We developed new photoresin formulations based on gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) for encapsulation of primary cells (murine myoblasts) and storage in printing cuvettes for at least a week at 4{degrees}C or -80{degrees}C. The tissues printed in microgravity based on the new formulations exhibited higher cell viability, number of proliferating cells and after maturation higher numbers of myotubes and fusion index compared to control formulations (i.e., GelMA dissolved in phosphate buffered saline). The microgravity-printed tissues also featured similar myotube density and fusion index to those printed using the same resins on-ground. The G-Flight printing concept, together with the new resins enabling refrigeration or cryopreservation with encapsulated cells, offers a promising solution for biofabrication in space.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.