"Why are you doing contraception? ... They don't need it in jail". Service provider views on womens access to contraception in Australian prisons
Smith, H.; Wilson, M.; Donovan, B.; Jones, J.; Butler, T.; Simpson, P.
Show abstract
IntroductionWomen with a history of incarceration report higher rates of pregnancy, pregnancy terminations, and the use of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception (LARC) methods, alongside poorer birth outcomes compared to non-justice involved women, suggesting distinctive family planning needs. Despite this, little is known on how this is provided within carceral settings, or the structural barriers experiences by both staff and other service providers. In this article, we report findings from a qualitative study conducted with a sample of professionals working in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, who either provide healthcare services to women either during incarceration or in the immediate post-release period. Specifically, we describe structural factors that may impede or support access to the provision, insertion or removal of contraception devices. MethodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with n=12 professionals, working in NSW, who either provide reproductive healthcare services to women during incarceration or in the immediate post-release period. Data was analysed thematically against the Vulnerable Populations Behaviour Model. ResultsSeven themes were identified relating to contraception service provision in prison. Participants observed specific patient characteristics which they believed were driving contraception needs including 1) a state of interrupted fertility caused by incarceration, and 2) post-release chaos which impeded access to appropriate family planning in the community. Areas of high need were characterised by 1) accessible, reversible and non-invasive contraception options, and 2) thoughtful counselling. Structural factors impeding contraception service access during incarceration included: 1) service priorities and staff biases negatively impacting access, 2) poor overall health service integration, and 3) inequitable funding models during incarceration. Consequently, incarcerated women do not have comparable access to contraception compared to women in the community. ConclusionThe lack of focus on contraception services in prison represents a missed opportunity to support highly marginalised women who may also face challenges accessing such services upon release.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Sources of Stress and Coping Mechanisms: Experiences of Maternal Health Care Providers in Western Kenya 96%
- “ She helped from the first minute to the last ” – experiences of respectful maternal and newborn care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Nampula Province, Mozambique 95%
- The cascading impacts of attacks on health in Syria: A qualitative study of health system and community impacts 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acceptability, feasibility and appropriateness of intensified health education, SMS/phone tracing and transport reimbursement for uptake of voluntary medical male circumcision in a sexually transmitted infections clinic in Malawi: a mixed methods study 97%
- Couple-Centered HIV Prevention and Care: Endorsement, Practice and Uncertainty among US Healthcare Providers in Western-Central Upstate New York 96%
- A PrEP Decision Aid for Women Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence: Task-Shifting Implementation to Domestic Violence Service Settings 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring High Mortality Rates Among People With Multiple And Complex Needs: A Qualitative Study Using Peer Research Methods 95%
- Men and sexual and reproductive healthcare in the Nordic countries: a scoping review 95%
- Companionship for women using English maternity services during COVID-19: National and organisational perspectives 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Access and quality of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services in Britain during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study of patient experiences 96%
- Should COVID-specific arrangements for abortion continue? The views of women experiencing abortion in Britain during the pandemic 96%
- Attitudes towards the regulation and provision of abortion among healthcare professionals in Britain; cross sectional survey data from the SACHA study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hair salons as a promising space to provide HIV and sexual and reproductive health services for young women in Lesotho: A citizen scientist mixed-methods study 96%
- "We have our reasons": Exploring the acceptability of pre-exposure prophylaxis among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men in Ghana 95%
- Mpox knowledge, behaviours and barriers to public health measures among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in the UK: A qualitative study to inform public health guidance and messaging 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.