Back

Biophysics of the Coronavirus-Membrane Interaction: Role of Nonequilibrium Binding Energy

Udema, I. I.

2025-06-12 biophysics
10.1101/2025.06.10.658990 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Scientists seemed not to have explored mechanical kinetic energy, a path function for the determination of nonequilibrium binding energy (NEBE). The study explored mechanical kinetic energy, a path function in particles that requires nonequilibrium binding energy (NEBE) to counteract it. It aimed to show that there was a minimally sufficient NEBE to counteract mechanical kinetic energy, using literature data to evaluate derived equations and computations. As is typical, diffusivities increase with temperature; however, near binding, the binding limitations cause the diffusivities (1.519 [->] 2.784 exp. (- 15) m2/s for D variant; 1.415[->]2.577 exp. (- 15) m2/s for G variant) to be lower than when they are far from binding (4.36 [->]7.99 exp. (- 15) m2/s for D variant; 4.151[->]7.611 exp. (- 15) m2/s for G variant). With breath emission equal to 1.29 exp. (7)/m3, the NEBEs were 656.020 and 663.212 kcal/mol for Delta and Omicron variants of SARS-CoV-2, respectively; and with 27.9 exp. (7)/m3, the corresponding values were 568.921 and 633 kcal/mol; with a breath emission rate equal to 9.31 exp. (+6)/hr., the NEBEs for the Omicron variant in 1 hr. and in 1 min. were 651.703 and 683.353 kcal/mol, respectively; with 201 exp. (+6)/hr., the corresponding values were 444.157 and 663.212 kcal/mol. The G variant of SARS-CoV-2 showed higher NEBEs (952[->]671 kcal/mol) than D variants (834[->]588 kcal/mol), corresponding to 293.15[->]318.15 K. The decreasing trend in maximum NEBE [Formula] with rising temperature implies that the binding affinity of the virus may be attenuated at higher temperatures. It is, therefore, medically plausible to administer airborne, parenteral, oral, etc., drugs at temperatures above body temperatures that are tolerable and in a controlled fashion. Future studies should be directed to a definite determination of the size and molar mass of variants of SARS-CoV-2.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Biophysics Journal
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.9%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 20%
8.4%
3
Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 30%
3.4%
5
Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.8%
6
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
7
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
8
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
9
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.8%
50% of probability mass above
10
RSC Advances
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
11
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.8%
12
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
13
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
14
Virus Research
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
15
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
16
The European Physical Journal Plus
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
17
Soft Matter
60 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
18
Journal of Theoretical Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
102 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
20
Virology
61 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
21
Mathematical Medicine and Biology: A Journal of the IMA
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
22
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
23
Physical Biology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
24
Langmuir
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
25
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
26
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
27
Pharmaceutics
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
28
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
29
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
30
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%