Back

Functional and compositional diversity display a maximum at intermediate levels of fire frequency when modeling the plant-fire feedback

Torrassa, M.; Vissio, G.; Diaz Sierra, R.; Magnani, M.; Eppinga, M.; Baudena, M.

2025-06-12 ecology
10.1101/2025.06.10.656287 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Fires are generally considered to promote biodiversity, although the exact relationship is unclear, because it can be affected by several factors, including fire regime and ecosystem type. Given the ongoing global change, a better understanding of this connection is needed to assess the extent to which projected increases in fire frequency may affect current biodiversity trends. A major challenge lies in vegetation-fire feedback, which often mediates changes in fire regimes. To shed light on the role of fires in promoting or limiting biodiversity, we studied the compositional and functional diversity of simulated plant communities along a gradient of fire frequencies. We extended an existing model to include a large number of species. The model reproduces plant successional dynamics and is parameterized to represent Boreal and Mediterranean communi-ties. Fire events are stochastic, with frequencies that depend on community flammability, and plants have different fire responses, thus creating a vegetation-fire feedback. For both ecosys-tems, we found that fires generally had a positive effect on both compositional and functional diversity. Furthermore, in most cases, both peaked at intermediate fire frequencies. Interestingly, compositional and functional diversity were correlated but did not reach their maximum values in the same communities. This seemingly underlines that a certain degree of functional similarity may be necessary to achieve maximum species richness. These results stem from the vegetation-fire feedback, highlighting its importance for predicting ecosystem responses to global change, including biodiversity losses and wildfire regime shifts.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.9%
2
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.5%
3
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
5
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.0%
8
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.7%
10
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
11
Journal of Biogeography
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
12
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
15
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
16
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
17
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
18
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
19
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
20
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
21
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
22
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
24
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
25
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 44%
0.8%
26
in silico Plants
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
27
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
28
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
29
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
30
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%