Back

Changes in Ocular Fixation Characteristics Over Time during Reading

Friedman, L.; Komogortsev, O.

2025-06-11 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.06.09.658738 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In this report, we evaluate eye-movements during reading. There is a huge literature on this topic, but our report is not focused on the typical questions raised in this literature and our task design is very atypical for an eye-movement/reading study. While most reading studies evaluate mental processes during reading, the only mental process we evaluate is fatigue. While most reading studies use stimuli presented in the middle of the screen, our poem sections are presented in 24 lines of text that span the top to the bottom of the display. While most multi-line reading studies use a very large interline spacing, our interline spacing is more typical of text reading in newspapers, magazines and books. We report on changes in the characteristics of fixations as a function of time-on-task (TOT). We determine the start and end of reading for each subject/session and divide this reading time into 10 equal length (number of samples) periods (referred to as epochs). We looked for changes in fixation characteristics across epochs. We emphasize our results for horizontal position because these changes were monotonic and interpretable. For horizontal position signals, we found that the mean intersample distances in fixations increases, the rate of changes of fixation position decreases and the total fixation width increases as a function of epoch. We interpret our results to mean that, as reading progresses, it becomes more difficult to hold the eye still. Early in reading, the total fixation width is lower, the mean intersample distance is lower and there are frequent adjustments (i.e., changes in direction) to keep the eye well focused on the target word. As time progresses, it becomes more and more difficult to hold the eye perfectly steady, so fixations become wider and mean intersample distance increases.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 1%
18.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
14.0%
3
Journal of Vision
92 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
4
Behavior Research Methods
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
6
Cognition
44 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
7
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.2%
8
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
9
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.7%
10
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
11
Consciousness and Cognition
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 31%
1.7%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.7%
14
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
15
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
16
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.5%
17
Neuroscience of Consciousness
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
18
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
Human Movement Science
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
20
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Communications Psychology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%