Back

Micro-aeration-enhanced Anaerobic Digestion for the Stabilization of Coffee-Processing Wastewater

Taiwo, K. J.; Ogundipe, S. O.; Kerr, W. L.; Pegg, R. B.; Suh, J. H.; Usack, J. G.

2025-06-12 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.06.09.658626 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Coffee processing wastewater (CPW), a byproduct of agro-industrial operations, contains high organic loads alongside recalcitrant and potentially inhibitory compounds such as caffeine and tannins. This study evaluated the performance of micro-aeration-enhanced anaerobic digestion (MA-AD) for the treatment and valorization of CPW to promote a more sustainable approach to coffee production. Oxygen was intermittently introduced via oxidation-reduction potential-controlled dosing, allowing for comparative assessment across anaerobic and micro-aerobic redox regimes. While both conventional anaerobic digestion (AD) and MA-AD achieved comparable reductions in total and volatile solids (>48% and >60%, respectively) and total and soluble chemical oxygen demand (>66% and >86%, respectively), MA-AD exhibited significantly higher total suspended solids concentrations and turbidity in later phases, likely due to gas sparging-induced floc disruption and particulate release. pH profiles indicated a shift toward increased acidification under MA-AD, without compromising process stability, with both reactors stabilizing between pH 6.8-7.1. Caffeine degradation was accelerated under MA-AD in the first dosing phase (>85% removal in 28 h), though long-term degradation efficiency converged with the control. Methane production was consistently lower in MA-AD (up to 43% reduction), attributed to the oxygen sensitivity of methanogens and possible substrate competition. These results underscore the importance of oxygen dose regulation, redox control, and microbial adaptation in optimizing MA-AD performance. The findings support MA-AD as a promising strategy for enhancing hydrolysis and partial removal of recalcitrant compounds in CPW. However, further refinement is required to sustain biogas quality and yield at scale.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.9%
2
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.9%
3
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
Chemical Engineering Journal
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
5
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.4%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.4%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.4%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.9%
9
Chemosphere
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
10
PLOS Water
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
11
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
12
Bioresource Technology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
13
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
14
ACS ES&T Water
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
15
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
16
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
17
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
18
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
20
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
21
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.5%