Back

CSLAN: Cross-Species Latent Alignment Network for Trauma-Related Cell-Type Classification

Wu, R.; Shi, A.; Liu, Y.; Duprey, A.; Chen, T.; Li, R.; Cao, S.

2025-06-12 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.06.09.655966 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding cellular identity and function across species is fundamental to deciphering conserved biological principles and translating insights from model organisms to human health. However, integrating single-cell transcriptomic data, particularly from resource-limited human studies, with comprehensive datasets from model organisms like mice remains a significant challenge due to evolutionary divergence and technical variability. Here, we introduce the Cross-Species Latent Alignment Network (CSLAN), a transfer learning framework that effectively bridges this gap for robust cell type classification. CSLAN employs a novel strategy involving focused feature selection on source (mouse) data followed by pretraining an encoder-decoder architecture. Crucially, for transfer to human data, only the encoder is fine-tuned while the latent space processor and the decoder, which encapsulate learned, conserved cell type signatures, remains fixed. This targeted adaptation mechanism allows CSLAN to achieve exceptional accuracy (e.g., 96.67% for human immune cells in a trauma context) by efficiently aligning human gene expression profiles to a biologically informed latent space derived from mouse data. Our findings establish a powerful and broadly applicable paradigm for cross-species knowledge transfer, enabling deeper biological insights from limited human scRNA-seq data by leveraging the wealth of information from model systems, with significant implications for translational research and the construction of comprehensive, cross-species cell atlases.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.