Back

Optimal dose and safety of intravenous favipiravir in hospitalised patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection: a Phase Ib, open-label, dose-escalating, randomised controlled study

Rowland, T.; FitzGerald, R.; Challenger, E.; Dickinson, L.; Else, L.; Walker, L.; Hale, C.; Shaw, V.; Kelly, C.; Lyon, R.; Gibney, J.; Dhamani, K.; Irwin, M.; Enever, Y.; Tetlow, M.; Wood, W.; Reynolds, H.; Chiong, J.; Osanlou, O.; Pertinez, H.; Bullock, K.; Greenhalf, W.; Owen, A.; Lalloo, D. G.; Jacobs, M.; Hiscox, J. A.; Jaki, T.; Mozgunov, P.; Saunders, G.; Griffiths, G.; Khoo, S. H.; Fletcher, T.; the AGILE CST-6 study group,

2025-06-09 pharmacology and therapeutics
10.1101/2025.06.09.25329141 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAGILE (NCT04746183) is a Phase Ib/IIa platform, evaluating candidates to treat COVID-19. CST-6 evaluated the safety and optimal dose of a novel intravenous (IV) formulation of favipiravir. MethodsCST-6 was a dose-escalating, open-label, randomised, controlled, Bayesian adaptive Phase Ib trial. Hospitalised adults with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, within 14 days of symptomatic COVID-19 were randomised 2:1 in groups of 6 (n = 4 favipiravir, n = 2 standard of care (SoC)) to ascending doses of IV favipiravir twice daily (b.i.d.) for 7 days or SoC. Clinical data, safety evaluations, virology and pharmacokinetic (PK) samples were collected. The primary outcome was safety. Secondary outcomes included clinical, PK and virological endpoints. Results24 participants enrolled between 10/Sep/2022 and 01/Nov/2023 [10/24 female; median age 74 years (range 52-93)]. Favipiravir was well tolerated despite a high background rate of unrelated adverse events (AEs). No dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed, with a model-predicted DLT risk of 16.8% and probability of unacceptable toxicity of 2.7% at the highest dose level. No SAEs were deemed related to favipiravir but an expected association with asymptomatic, transient hyperuricaemia was observed. PK exposures increased disproportionally to dose with significant accumulation in plasma, but with marked variability between participants within each cohort. ConclusionsA novel formulation of favipiravir was safe at sustained high doses that reached PK targets in a study group with frailty and complex health profiles. Plasma concentrations demonstrated accumulation. Significant variability in PK parameters between individuals was noted. We consider doses up to 2400mg b.i.d. to be safe for further evaluation. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04746183 Key pointsO_LIA novel intravenous formulation of favipiravir, was safe and well tolerated in a frail and complex population, up to a dose of 2400mg b.i.d. C_LIO_LISignificant inter-individual variability in pharmacokinetic parameters was observed. C_LIO_LIPharmacokinetic modelling suggests pre-specified target concentrations were met. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.2%
2
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.8%
3
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.9%
5
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.6%
8
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
9
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
10
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
11
Pharmaceutics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
13
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
14
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
16
Emerging Microbes & Infections
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
17
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
18
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
19
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 76%
0.7%
23
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
26
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
27
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%
28
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
10 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
29
Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
30
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%