Optimal dose and safety of intravenous favipiravir in hospitalised patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection: a Phase Ib, open-label, dose-escalating, randomised controlled study
Rowland, T.; FitzGerald, R.; Challenger, E.; Dickinson, L.; Else, L.; Walker, L.; Hale, C.; Shaw, V.; Kelly, C.; Lyon, R.; Gibney, J.; Dhamani, K.; Irwin, M.; Enever, Y.; Tetlow, M.; Wood, W.; Reynolds, H.; Chiong, J.; Osanlou, O.; Pertinez, H.; Bullock, K.; Greenhalf, W.; Owen, A.; Lalloo, D. G.; Jacobs, M.; Hiscox, J. A.; Jaki, T.; Mozgunov, P.; Saunders, G.; Griffiths, G.; Khoo, S. H.; Fletcher, T.; the AGILE CST-6 study group,
Show abstract
BackgroundAGILE (NCT04746183) is a Phase Ib/IIa platform, evaluating candidates to treat COVID-19. CST-6 evaluated the safety and optimal dose of a novel intravenous (IV) formulation of favipiravir. MethodsCST-6 was a dose-escalating, open-label, randomised, controlled, Bayesian adaptive Phase Ib trial. Hospitalised adults with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, within 14 days of symptomatic COVID-19 were randomised 2:1 in groups of 6 (n = 4 favipiravir, n = 2 standard of care (SoC)) to ascending doses of IV favipiravir twice daily (b.i.d.) for 7 days or SoC. Clinical data, safety evaluations, virology and pharmacokinetic (PK) samples were collected. The primary outcome was safety. Secondary outcomes included clinical, PK and virological endpoints. Results24 participants enrolled between 10/Sep/2022 and 01/Nov/2023 [10/24 female; median age 74 years (range 52-93)]. Favipiravir was well tolerated despite a high background rate of unrelated adverse events (AEs). No dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed, with a model-predicted DLT risk of 16.8% and probability of unacceptable toxicity of 2.7% at the highest dose level. No SAEs were deemed related to favipiravir but an expected association with asymptomatic, transient hyperuricaemia was observed. PK exposures increased disproportionally to dose with significant accumulation in plasma, but with marked variability between participants within each cohort. ConclusionsA novel formulation of favipiravir was safe at sustained high doses that reached PK targets in a study group with frailty and complex health profiles. Plasma concentrations demonstrated accumulation. Significant variability in PK parameters between individuals was noted. We consider doses up to 2400mg b.i.d. to be safe for further evaluation. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04746183 Key pointsO_LIA novel intravenous formulation of favipiravir, was safe and well tolerated in a frail and complex population, up to a dose of 2400mg b.i.d. C_LIO_LISignificant inter-individual variability in pharmacokinetic parameters was observed. C_LIO_LIPharmacokinetic modelling suggests pre-specified target concentrations were met. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Optimal dose and safety of molnupiravir in patients with early SARS-CoV-2: a phase 1, dose-escalating, randomised controlled study 97%
- Pharmacokinetic modelling to estimate intracellular favipiravir ribofuranosyl-5’-triphosphate exposure to support posology for SARS-CoV-2 95%
- Optimal dosing of cefotaxime and desacetylcefotaxime for critically ill paediatric patients. Can we use microsampling? 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Innovative Randomized Phase 1 Study and Dosing Regimen Selection to Accelerate and Inform Pivotal COVID-19 Trial of Nirmatrelvir 96%
- MTXPK.org: A clinical decision support tool evaluating high-dose methotrexate pharmacokinetics to inform post-infusion care and use of glucarpidase 91%
- A dose-finding study to guide use of verapamil as an adjunctive therapy in tuberculosis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The safety of antivirals and neutralising monoclonal antibodies used in prehospital treatment of Covid-19 93%
- Real-world effectiveness of molnupiravir, nirmatrelvir-ritonavir, and sotrovimab on preventing hospital admission among higher-risk patients with COVID-19 in Wales: a retrospective cohort study 91%
- Assessment of a vancomycin dosing guideline and identification of predictive factors associated with dose and drug trough levels 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pharmacokinetics and safety of XAV-19, a swine glyco-humanized polyclonal anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody, for COVID-19-related moderate pneumonia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase IIa study 96%
- Human Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of a Novel Broad-Spectrum Oral Antiviral Compound, Molnupiravir, with Activity Against SARS-CoV-2 96%
- Plasma pharmacokinetics of high dose oral versus intravenous rifampicin in patients with tuberculous meningitis: a randomized controlled trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical safety and pharmacokinetics of a novel oral niclosamide formulation compared with marketed niclosamide chewing tablets in healthy volunteers: a three-part randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial 93%
- Phase I study on the pharmacokinetics of intravaginal, self-administered artesunate vaginal pessaries among women in Kenya 91%
- Tolerability and Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Inhaled Dry Powder Hydroxychloroquine in Healthy Volunteers 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.