Back

Phenotypic and prognostic insights through unbiased self-supervised learning on kidney histology

Pandit, K.; Coudray, N.; Quiros, A. C.; Surapaneni, A.; Upadhyay, D.; Vanguri, R. S.; Hirohama, D.; Mohandes, S.; Schlosser, P.; Thiessen-Philbrook, H.; Wen, Y.; Parikh, C. R.; Rhee, E. P.; Waikar, S.; Schmidt, I. M.; Rosenberg, A. Z.; Palmer, M. B.; Susztak, K.; Grams, M. E.; Tsirigos, A.

2025-06-10 pathology
10.1101/2025.06.09.25328891 medRxiv
Show abstract

Deep learning methods for image segmentation and classification in histopathology generally utilize supervised learning, relying on manually created labels for model development. Here, we applied a self-supervised framework to characterize kidney histology without the use of pathologist annotations, training on whole slide images to identify histomorphological phenotype clusters (HPCs) and create slide-level vector representations. HPCs developed in the training set were visually consistent when transferred to five diverse internal and external validation sets (1,421 WSIs in total). Specific HPCs were reproducibly associated with slide-level pathologist quantifications, such as interstitial fibrosis (AUC = 0.83). Additionally, hierarchical clustering of tissue patterns revealed patient groups related to kidney function and genotype, and specific HPCs predicted longitudinal kidney function decline. Overall, we demonstrated the translational application of a self-supervised framework to summarize distinct kidney tissue patterns with phenotypic and prognostic relevance.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.