Back

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on end of life care in LTCFs in England: A qualitative study of LTCF staff experiences

Cotterell, N.; Collingridge Moore, D.

2025-06-09 geriatric medicine
10.1101/2025.06.09.25328142
Show abstract

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic significantly increased the number of deaths within LTCFs globally. Restrictions around visitation and social distancing were common, however, research conducted during the pandemic demonstrates that these policies impacted the ways in which end of life care was delivered in LTCFs. AimThis paper aims to understand the experiences of LTCF staff in providing end of life care in the UK and explores the barriers and facilitators to doing so in the context of policies issued by the government at the time. MethodsData from semi-structured interviews conducted with 24 LTCF staff working across eight LTCFs in the north-west of England were analysed. Qualitative interviews were conducted with LTCF staff members, exploring their experiences of working in adult social care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Themes related to providing end of life care during this time were identified and analysed using thematic analysis. FindingsThematic analysis identified four key themes including: discrepancies in following COVID-19 UK government guidelines including visitation at end of life as an exception; the influence of staffing on delivering end of life care; utilising technology to substitute physical presence at end of life visits; and the emotional impact of delivering end of life care under COVID-19 restrictions. ConclusionsThe findings demonstrate the numerous challenges care staff experienced when delivering end of life care during the COVID-19 pandemic in terms of the practicalities of managing resident deaths, facilitating visitation and the associated impact on emotional wellbeing. Ensuring that all LTCF staff are trained to recognise end of life care, in the event of a future pandemic, will better equip LTCFs. In addition, it is paramount that the government provide consistent guidance on managing family contact at end of life, while taking into account the impact of implementing such guidance on the mental and emotional wellbeing of LTCF staff members.

Matching journals

1
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 22%
18.2%
2
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 5%
4.3× avg
3
Age and Ageing
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 27 published papers
Top 0.2%
87× avg
4
BMC Geriatrics
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 15 published papers
Top 0.1%
134× avg
5
Palliative Medicine
SAGE Publications · based on 10 published papers
Top 0.1%
130× avg
6
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
Elsevier BV · based on 12 published papers
Top 0.3%
88× avg
7
The Lancet Healthy Longevity
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
#1
178× avg
8
Archives of Public Health
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 12 published papers
#1
69× avg
9
Frontiers in Public Health
Frontiers Media SA · based on 135 published papers
Top 9%
3.0× avg
10
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
MDPI AG · based on 116 published papers
Top 13%
2.0× avg
11
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 12 published papers
Top 0.8%
21× avg
12
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Wiley · based on 12 published papers
Top 0.8%
14× avg
13
Health Expectations
Wiley · based on 12 published papers
Top 1%
13× avg
14
eClinicalMedicine
Elsevier BV · based on 55 published papers
Top 4%
4.1× avg
15
BMC Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 155 published papers
Top 23%
0.7%
16
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ · based on 15 published papers
Top 3%
6.6× avg