Back

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on end of life care in LTCFs in England: A qualitative study of LTCF staff experiences

Cotterell, N.; Collingridge Moore, D.

2025-06-09 geriatric medicine
10.1101/2025.06.09.25328142 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic significantly increased the number of deaths within LTCFs globally. Restrictions around visitation and social distancing were common, however, research conducted during the pandemic demonstrates that these policies impacted the ways in which end of life care was delivered in LTCFs. AimThis paper aims to understand the experiences of LTCF staff in providing end of life care in the UK and explores the barriers and facilitators to doing so in the context of policies issued by the government at the time. MethodsData from semi-structured interviews conducted with 24 LTCF staff working across eight LTCFs in the north-west of England were analysed. Qualitative interviews were conducted with LTCF staff members, exploring their experiences of working in adult social care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Themes related to providing end of life care during this time were identified and analysed using thematic analysis. FindingsThematic analysis identified four key themes including: discrepancies in following COVID-19 UK government guidelines including visitation at end of life as an exception; the influence of staffing on delivering end of life care; utilising technology to substitute physical presence at end of life visits; and the emotional impact of delivering end of life care under COVID-19 restrictions. ConclusionsThe findings demonstrate the numerous challenges care staff experienced when delivering end of life care during the COVID-19 pandemic in terms of the practicalities of managing resident deaths, facilitating visitation and the associated impact on emotional wellbeing. Ensuring that all LTCF staff are trained to recognise end of life care, in the event of a future pandemic, will better equip LTCFs. In addition, it is paramount that the government provide consistent guidance on managing family contact at end of life, while taking into account the impact of implementing such guidance on the mental and emotional wellbeing of LTCF staff members.

Published in Palliative Care and Social Practice · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Geriatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.5%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 13%
14.3%
3
Palliative Medicine
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
7.1%
5
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
Age and Ageing
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
7
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
9
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
10
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
11
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
12
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
13
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
14
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
15
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
16
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
The Lancet Healthy Longevity
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
18
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
19
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
20
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
22
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
23
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
24
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%