Back

'It's like the spirit of the blitz': the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on LTCF staff working relationships in England.

Collingridge Moore, D.; Cotterell, N.

2025-06-09 geriatric medicine
10.1101/2025.06.09.25328141 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic created novel challenges for staff working in the adult social care sector, however its impact on staff working relationships within facilities is unclear. The aim of this study is to explore the effect the pandemic had on staff working relationships. MethodSecondary analysis of data collected in semi-structured, qualitative interviews with LTCF staff. Twenty-four participants working in eight LTCFs in England were recruited to discuss their experiences of working in a LTCF during the COVID-19 pandemic. Thematic analysis was used to explore the impact of the pandemic on staff working relationships. ResultsSeven themes were identified, these were a) a shared commitment to providing care to residents, b) strengthening working relationships between staff members, c) adapting to novel and changing roles, d) working as an incentive for socialisation, e) leadership by example, f) recruitment and retraining of new staff, and g) divisions between furloughed and attending LTCF staff. DiscussionThe findings show that within the challenges that the pandemic created for LTCFs, staff members reported improved staff working relationships, characteristics by strengthened bonds between staff, improvements in team working and developing new approaches to resident care. However, furloughed and newly recruited staff members were, at times, excluded from these developments. Further research is needed to explore how improvements to staff working relationships can be replicated and sustained prior to future pandemics, and the supportive effect these may have on quality of care and staff mental health and wellbeing.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Geriatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.5%
2
Age and Ageing
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.4%
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
6
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
7
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
8
Palliative Medicine
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
9
The Lancet Healthy Longevity
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
10
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
11
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
12
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
16
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
17
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
BMC Psychiatry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
19
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
20
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
22
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
23
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
24
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%