Back

Working memory modulates auditory perceptual sensitivity during speech planning

Merrikhi, Y.; Daliri, A.

2025-06-06 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.06.05.658114 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeWorking memory plays a critical role in speech production. However, how working memory influences speech systems remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate how maintaining a vowel in working memory alters perceptual sensitivity during speech planning. Method: Thirty healthy adults completed speaking and reading tasks while performing a concurrent working memory task. In speaking blocks, participants produced monosyllabic words, whereas in reading blocks, they silently read them. During each trial, participants categorized an auditory probe stimulus positioned between the vowels /{varepsilon}/ and /ae/. Trials were classified as congruent or incongruent depending on whether the vowel maintained in working memory matched the auditory target. Perceptual sensitivity and speech variability were measured across conditions. ResultsIn the speaking condition, participants showed higher perceptual sensitivity in congruent trials compared to incongruent trials, indicating that maintaining a vowel in working memory biased auditory target perception during speech planning. No such effect was observed in the reading condition. Additionally, participants exhibited a trend of reduced speech variability in congruent compared to incongruent trials, suggesting that working memory modulates speech outcome. No significant relationship was found between changes in perceptual sensitivity and speech variability across subjects. ConclusionThese findings suggest that maintaining a vowel in working memory shapes auditory target representations and modulates speech outcomes. This study provides novel evidence for the influence of working memory on speech systems.

Published in Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research (predicted rank #2) · training set

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.