Dual-stage AI system for Pathologist-Free Tumor Detectionand subtyping in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Chaudhary, N.; Muddemanavar, P.; Singh, D. K.; Rai, A.; Mishra, D.; SV, S.; Augustine, J.; Chandra, A.; Chaurasia, A.; Ahmad, T.
Show abstract
BackgroundAccurate histological grading of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is critical for prognosis and treatment planning. Current methods lack automation for OSCC detection, subtyping, and differentiation from high-risk pre-malignant conditions like oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF). Further, analysis of whole-slide image (WSI) analysis is time-consuming and variable, limiting consistency. We present a clinically relevant deep learning framework that leverages weakly supervised learning and attention-based multiple instance learning (MIL) to enable automated OSCC grading and early prediction of malignant transformation from OSMF. MethodsWe conducted a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study using a curated dataset of 1,925 whole-slide images (WSIs), including 1,586 OSCC cases stratified into well-, moderately-, and poorly-differentiated subtypes (WD, MD, and PD), 128 normal controls, and 211 OSMF and OSMF with OSCC cases. We developed a two-stage deep learning pipeline named OralPatho. In stage one, an attention-based multiple instance learning (MIL) model was trained to perform binary classification (normal vs OSCC). In stage two, a gated attention mechanism with top-K patch selection was employed to classify the OSCC subtypes. Model performance was assessed using stratified 3-fold cross-validation and external validation on an independent dataset. FindingsThe binary classifier demonstrated robust performance with a mean F1-score exceeding 0.93 across all validation folds. The multiclass model achieved consistent macro-F1 scores of 0.72, 0.70, and 0.68, along with AUCs of 0.79 for WD, 0.71 for MD, and 0.61 for PD OSCC subtypes. Model generalizability was validated using an independent external dataset. Attention maps reliably highlighted clinically relevant histological features, supporting the systems interpretability and diagnostic alignment with expert pathological assessment. InterpretationThis study demonstrates the feasibility of attention-based, weakly supervised learning for accurate OSCC grading from whole-slide images. OralPatho combines high diagnostic performance with real-time interpretability, making it a scalable solution for both advanced pathology labs and resource-limited settings.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Weakly-Supervised Tumor Purity Prediction FromFrozen H&E Stained Slides 94%
- Integrative deep learning analysis improves colon adenocarcinoma patient stratification at risk for mortality 93%
- Annotation-free multi-organ anomaly detection in abdominal CT using free-text radiology reports: A multi-center retrospective study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Histology-based Prediction of Therapy Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Adenocarcinomas Using Deep Learning 93%
- Using Adversarial Images to Assess the Stability of Deep Learning Models Trained on Diagnostic Images in Oncology 91%
- Simple Linear Cancer Risk Prediction Models with Novel Features Outperform Complex Approaches 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multi-resolution deep learning characterizestertiary lymphoid structures in solid tumors 94%
- A user-friendly tool for cloud-based whole slide image segmentation, with examples from renal histopathology 92%
- LUNAR: A Deep Learning Model to Predict Glioma Recurrence Using Integrated Genomic and Clinical Data 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- High-Sensitivity Pan-Cancer AI Assessment of Lymph Node Metastasis via Uncertainty Quantification 93%
- A human-in-the-loop explanation framework for morphologically transparent AI predictions from whole-slide images 93%
- STPath: A Generative Foundation Model for Integrating Spatial Transcriptomics and Whole Slide Images 91%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.