Back

Title: Disparities in deworming coverage between children with and without disabilities: insights from the DeWorm3 trial in India

Chen, S.; Ramesh, R. M.; Aruldas, K.; Kaliappan, S. P.; Chandy, B. R.; Koshy, B.; Jasper, S.; Halliday, K. E.; Walson, J. L.; Oswald, W.; Ajjampur, S. S. R.; Kuper, H.

2025-06-06 public and global health
10.1101/2025.06.05.25329067 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundChildren with disabilities experience lower school enrollment rates and may be systematically excluded from school-based deworming programs. The DeWorm3 trial provided an opportunity to evaluate whether community-wide mass drug administration (cMDA) could reduce these disparities by reaching children outside the education system. MethodsWe conducted a secondary analysis of the data from the DeWorm3 trial in Tamil Nadu, India. Children aged 5-17 years (n=82,417) who participated in at least one of the six rounds of cMDA were included. Disability was assessed using the UNICEF/Washington Groups Child Functioning Module. Mixed-effects logistic regression models examined associations between disability status and treatment coverage, adjusting for sociodemographic factors. ResultsChildren with disabilities (1.1% of the population) had higher unadjusted odds of not receiving deworming treatment compared to children without disabilities (OR=1.49, 95% CI: 1.19-1.84), though this association was attenuated after adjustment (adjusted OR=1.10, 95% CI: 0.86-1.37). Among school-attending children who received treatment, those with disabilities had significantly lower odds of receiving school-based treatment (adjusted OR=0.57, 95% CI: 0.44-0.73). Subgroup analyses revealed that age, school attendance, parental marital status, geographic location, and the COVID-19 pandemic significantly modified these associations. ConclusionWhile community-wide mass drug administration reduced some disparities in deworming coverage, children with disabilities remained less likely to receive school-based treatment. Public health programs should combine school-based approaches with targeted community outreach strategies to ensure equitable inclusion of children with disabilities, particularly those experiencing multiple vulnerabilities.

Published in BMJ Global Health (predicted rank #5) · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.