Title: Disparities in deworming coverage between children with and without disabilities: insights from the DeWorm3 trial in India
Chen, S.; Ramesh, R. M.; Aruldas, K.; Kaliappan, S. P.; Chandy, B. R.; Koshy, B.; Jasper, S.; Halliday, K. E.; Walson, J. L.; Oswald, W.; Ajjampur, S. S. R.; Kuper, H.
Show abstract
BackgroundChildren with disabilities experience lower school enrollment rates and may be systematically excluded from school-based deworming programs. The DeWorm3 trial provided an opportunity to evaluate whether community-wide mass drug administration (cMDA) could reduce these disparities by reaching children outside the education system. MethodsWe conducted a secondary analysis of the data from the DeWorm3 trial in Tamil Nadu, India. Children aged 5-17 years (n=82,417) who participated in at least one of the six rounds of cMDA were included. Disability was assessed using the UNICEF/Washington Groups Child Functioning Module. Mixed-effects logistic regression models examined associations between disability status and treatment coverage, adjusting for sociodemographic factors. ResultsChildren with disabilities (1.1% of the population) had higher unadjusted odds of not receiving deworming treatment compared to children without disabilities (OR=1.49, 95% CI: 1.19-1.84), though this association was attenuated after adjustment (adjusted OR=1.10, 95% CI: 0.86-1.37). Among school-attending children who received treatment, those with disabilities had significantly lower odds of receiving school-based treatment (adjusted OR=0.57, 95% CI: 0.44-0.73). Subgroup analyses revealed that age, school attendance, parental marital status, geographic location, and the COVID-19 pandemic significantly modified these associations. ConclusionWhile community-wide mass drug administration reduced some disparities in deworming coverage, children with disabilities remained less likely to receive school-based treatment. Public health programs should combine school-based approaches with targeted community outreach strategies to ensure equitable inclusion of children with disabilities, particularly those experiencing multiple vulnerabilities.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the impact of Covid-19 on Nurturing Care in Nairobi Slums: Findings from 5 rounds of cross-sectional telephone surveys 94%
- The impact of a demand-side sanitation and hygiene promotion intervention on sustained behavior change and health in Amhara, Ethiopia: a cluster-randomized trial 94%
- Qualitative Study of Acceptability, Benefits, and Feasibility of a Food-based Intervention among Participants and Stakeholders of the RATIONS Trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Fixed-Dose Ivermectin for Mass Drug Administration: Is it time to leave the dose pole behind? Insights from an Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis 95%
- Assessing the knowledge, attitudes, practices, and perspectives of stakeholders of the deworming program in rural Rwanda 95%
- Patient insights research exploring disease awareness, patient life experience, and current management of visceral leishmaniasis in Bihar, India 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving malaria case management with artemisinin-based combination therapies and malaria rapid diagnostic tests in private medicine retail outlets in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review 94%
- Predictors of vaccination card retention in Tamale Metropolis, Ghana 94%
- Child diarrhea in Cambodia: A descriptive analysis of temporal and geospatial trends and logistic regression-based examination of factors associated with diarrhea in children under five years 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Maternal Factors Promoting Normal Linear Growth of Children from Impoverished Rwandan Households 93%
- Interrupting the intergenerational cycle of violence: protocol for a three-generational longitudinal mixed-methods study in South Africa (INTERRUPT_VIOLENCE) 92%
- Community Perceptions of Vaccination Among Influential Stakeholders: Qualitative Research in Rural India 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.