Human-Centered Design of an Artificial Intelligence (AI) Monitoring System: The Vanderbilt Algorithmovigilance Monitoring and Operations System (VAMOS)
Salwei, M. E.; Davis, S. E.; Reale, C.; Novak, L. L.; Walsh, C. G.; Beebe, R.; Nelson, S.; Sundrani, S.; Rose, S.; Wright, A.; Ripperger, M.; Shave, P.; Embi, P.
Show abstract
Background.As the use of AI in healthcare is rapidly expanding, there is also growing recognition of the need for ongoing monitoring of AI after implementation, called algorithmovigilance. Yet, there remain few systems that support systematic monitoring and governance of AI used across a health system. In this study, we describe the human-centered design (HCD) process used to develop the Vanderbilt Algorithmovigilance Monitoring and Operations System (VAMOS). Methods.We assembled a multidisciplinary team to plan AI monitoring and governance at VUMC. We then conducted nine participatory design sessions with diverse stakeholders to develop prototypes of VAMOS. Once we had a working prototype, we conducted eight formative design interviews with key stakeholders to gather feedback on the system. We analyzed the interviews using a rapid qualitative analysis approach and revised the mock-ups. We then conducted a multidisciplinary heuristic evaluation to identify further improvements to the tool. Results.Through an iterative, HCD process, we identified key components needed in AI monitoring systems. We identified specific data views and functionality required by end users across several user interfaces including a performance monitoring dashboard, accordion snapshots, and model-specific pages. We distilled general design guidelines for systems to support AI monitoring throughout its lifecycle. One important consideration is how to support teams of health system leaders, clinical experts, and technical personnel that are distributed across the organization as they monitor and respond to algorithm deterioration. Conclusion.VAMOS enables systematic and proactive monitoring of AI tools in healthcare organizations. Our findings and recommendations can support the design of AI monitoring systems to support health systems, improve quality of care and ensure patient safety.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and preliminary testing of Health Equity Across the AI Lifecycle (HEAAL): A framework for healthcare delivery organizations to mitigate the risk of AI solutions worsening health inequities 96%
- From months to minutes: creating Hyperion, a novel data management system expediting data insights for oncology research and patient care 96%
- Theory of radiologist interaction with instant messaging decision support tools: a sequential-explanatory study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Connecting Artificial Intelligence and Primary Care Challenges: Findings from a Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative Consultation 96%
- User Testing of a Diagnostic Decision Support System with Machine-assisted Chart Review to Facilitate Clinical Genomic Diagnosis 93%
- Development of a customised data management system for a COVID-19-adapted colorectal cancer pathway 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Design and implementation of a system for automated monitoring of adherence to evidenced-based clinical guideline recommendations 96%
- Understanding how the design and implementation of Online Consultations influence primary care outcomes: Systematic review of evidence with recommendations for designers, providers, and researchers 95%
- Improving Patient Engagement in Phase 2 Clinical Trials with a Trial-specific Patient Decision Aid (tPDA): A Development and Usability Study 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.