Olfactory cleft obstruction in post-COVID-19 olfactory disorder: CT Comparison with post-viral cases
Tanaka, H.; Mori, E.; Kishimoto, Y.; Yonezawa, N.; Sekine, R.; Nagai, M.; Tei, M.; Otori, N.
Show abstract
BackgroundPost-COVID-19 olfactory dysfunction (PCOD) is a common sequela of SARS-CoV-2 infection, with some cases persisting beyond the acute phase. While prolonged PCOD has been considered primarily sensorineural, recent studies suggest that olfactory cleft (OC) obstruction may contribute to olfactory dysfunction (OD). This study aimed to investigate OC obstruction in prolonged PCOD compared to post-infectious olfactory dysfunction (PIOD) and assess its impact on olfactory function. Methodology/PrincipalWe retrospectively analysed sinus computed tomography scans of patients with prolonged PCOD and PIOD. OC obstruction was classified into absent (0%), mild (1-90%), and severe (>90%) types. The severity of OC obstruction was compared between PCOD and PIOD cases, and olfactory test results were analysed according to OC obstruction severity. ResultsA total of 87 PCOD patients and 67 PIOD patients were included. Mild and severe OC obstruction was more prevalent and severe in prolonged PCOD (mild: 35.6%, severe: 18.4%) than PIOD (mild: 13.4%, severe: 3%). Moreover, worsened olfactory function was found in PCOD patients with severe OC obstruction. In contrast, OC obstruction showed little association with olfactory function in PIOD patients. ConclusionsMild and Severe OC obstruction appear to be more common in prolonged PCOD. Moreover, severe OC obstruction may further impair olfactory function in PCOD patients. Conversely, severe OD in PIOD patients occurred independently of OC obstruction.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- High prevalence of long-term psychophysical olfactory dysfunction in patients with COVID-19 97%
- Predicting Olfactory Loss In Chronic Rhinosinusitis Using Machine Learning 96%
- Objective sensory testing methods reveal a higher prevalence of olfactory loss in COVID-19 positive patients compared to subjective methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Olfactory Training Efficiency In Post-COVID-19 Persistent Olfactory Disorders 97%
- Diagnostic accuracy of a novel SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic test from standardized self-collected anterior nasal swabs 93%
- Aerodigestoscopy (ADS): A retrospective examination of the feasibility, safety, and comfort of a new procedure for the evaluation of physiological disorders of the aerodigestive tract 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prevalence of Chemosensory Dysfunction in COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Reveals Significant Ethnic Differences 92%
- A novel maxillofacial technique to deliver drugs to the visual pathway, the optic nerve and the retina using the glymphatic system. 90%
- Methylmalonic acid compromises mitochondrial respiration and reduces the expression of markers of differentiation in SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- Diagnostic Performance and Characteristics of Anterior Nasal Collection for the SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test: A Prospective Study in Japan 93%
- Reduced Olfactory Bulb Volume Accompanies Smelling Dysfunction After Mild SARS-CoV-2 Infection: The Hamburg City Health Study COVID Program 92%
- Detailed Analysis of Surface Infection Barrier on Hands: Relationship with Morbidity to Infection Diseases and Identification of Antimicrobial Components 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.