Enhancing Fairness in Diabetes Prediction Systems through Smart User Interface Design
Tavangar, A.; Arefzadeh, Z.; Asghari, A. N.
Show abstract
ObjectivesArtificial intelligence (AI) in chronic disease prediction often exhibits algorithmic biases, hindering equitable healthcare delivery. This study aims to develop and evaluate a Smart User Interface (Smart UI) framework that enhances fairness in diabetes prediction systems by operationalizing fairness at the human-computer interaction level, a dimension frequently overlooked in AI fairness research. Materials and MethodsWe employed a nine-metric fairness evaluation framework across four demographically diverse diabetes datasets (Kaggle, Pima Indian, Azure Open, CDC Health Indicators). The Smart UI integrates contextual adjustment tools, dynamic visualizations, real-time alerts, and transparent reporting, combining structured EHR data, wearable sensor inputs, and unstructured clinical notes via natural language processing. The framework was evaluated on a clinical dataset to assess fairness and performance improvements. ResultsThe Smart UI significantly reduced disparities: for age, the equal opportunity difference (EOD) improved from 0.35 to 0.25, with accuracy rising from 90.52% to 91.83%; for BMI, EOD decreased from 0.56 to 0.38, with the F1-score increasing from 83.89% to 86.37%. These outcomes highlight the frameworks ability to enhance fairness without altering underlying algorithms. DiscussionWhile the Smart UI demonstrates promise as a model-agnostic, scalable solution for equitable AI deployment, challenges such as data privacy, usability, and real-time processing persist. The frameworks reliance on diverse data sources and user-centered design underscores its potential, though validation in broader clinical settings is needed. ConclusionThe Smart UI offers a replicable blueprint for embedding fairness in healthcare AI through interface design. Future research should focus on multicenter trials and applications to other chronic diseases to advance inclusive digital health solutions.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Racial disparities in continuous glucose monitoring-based 60-min glucose predictions among people with type 1 diabetes 94%
- Development and preliminary testing of Health Equity Across the AI Lifecycle (HEAAL): A framework for healthcare delivery organizations to mitigate the risk of AI solutions worsening health inequities 94%
- From theoretical models to practical deployment: A perspective and case study of opportunities and challenges in AI-driven healthcare research for low-income settings 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A digital self-care intervention for Ugandan patients with heart failure and their clinicians: User-centred design and usability study 93%
- Validating a Clinical Decision Support System for Palliative Care using healthcare professionals’ insights 93%
- Towards Reliable Diabetes Prediction: Innovations in Data Engineering and Machine Learning Applications 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A scoping review of fair machine learning techniques when using real-world data 94%
- Mining for Equitable Health: Assessing the Impact of Missing Data in Electronic Health Records 94%
- EHR-QC: A streamlined pipeline for automated electronic health records standardisation and preprocessing to predict clinical outcomes 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.