Clinical rationale of mood stabilizers in treating depression: Insights from prescriptions and adherence patterns
SUGAHARA, H.
Show abstract
ImportanceMood stabilizers are typically reserved for bipolar disorders, yet their role in treating unipolar depression remains underexplored despite clinical need and theoretical rationale. ObjectiveTo evaluate the association between low-dose mood stabilizer use and 6-month treatment retention in patients with unipolar and bipolar depression. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis retrospective cohort study analyzed medical records from a single outpatient psychiatric clinic in Japan between 2016 and 2022, including 300 patients with unipolar or bipolar depression initiating pharmacotherapy (100 patients per year). ExposuresPrescription of mood stabilizers (e.g., lithium, valproate), antidepressants, or both. Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was 6-month treatment retention, used as a proxy for pharmacotherapy adherence, reflecting long-term drug tolerability and real-world clinical effectiveness. Retention rates were compared across treatment types using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses adjusted for demographic and clinical variables. ResultsMood stabilizer prescriptions increased from 27% in 2016 to 89% in 2022. Patients with unipolar depression treated with mood stabilizers exhibited significantly higher 6-month retention compared to those on antidepressants alone (adjusted HR: 0.44; 95% CI, 0.24-0.80; p <.01). Side effects were mild and manageable, with high continuation rates observed for low-dose regimens. Conclusions and RelevanceLow-dose mood stabilizers, particularly lithium and valproate, were associated with significantly higher treatment retention rates in unipolar depression compared to antidepressants alone. These findings suggest the potential role of mood stabilizers in enhancing treatment adherence and highlight the need for confirmatory prospective studies to evaluate their comparative effectiveness. Key PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSCan low-dose mood stabilizers improve 6-month treatment retention among patients with unipolar depression? FindingsIn this retrospective cohort study of 185 patients with unipolar depression, treatment with low-dose lithium or valproate was associated with significantly higher 6-month treatment retention compared to antidepressants alone (adjusted HR: 0.44; 95% CI, 0.24-0.80; p <.01). MeaningLow-dose mood stabilizers may improve treatment adherence in unipolar depression, warranting reconsideration of their role in treatment guidelines.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Subjective mental health and need for care among psychiatric outpatients during the COVID-19 pandemic: results from an outreach initiative in Sweden 93%
- The Relationship between Cannabis Use and Cognition in People with Bipolar Disorder: A Systematic Scoping Review 93%
- Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy with antidepressant treatment in patients with treatment-resistant depression in Japan 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating heterogeneity of treatment effect in psychiatric clinical trials 91%
- Unilateral and Bilateral Theta Burst Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression: Follow up on a Naturalistic Observation Study 91%
- Divergent transcriptomic profiles in depressed individuals with hyper- and hypophagia implicating inflammatory status 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pharmacotherapy, drug-drug interactions and potentially inappropriate medication in depressive disorders 96%
- Predicting intentions towards long-term antidepressant use in the management of people with depression in primary care: A longitudinal survey study 94%
- Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Treatment-Resistant Depression: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The development and validation of a prognostic model to predict relapse in adults with remitted depression in primary care: secondary analysis of pooled individual participant data from multiple studies 92%
- Single-session intervention with and without video support to prevent the worsening of emotional distress among healthcare workers during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a randomized clinical trial 91%
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Antidepressant Prescribing with a focus on people with learning disability and autism: An interrupted time-series analysis in England using OpenSAFELY-TPP 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.