Prediction of impulse control disorders in Parkinson's disease: a longitudinal machine learning study
Vamvakas, A.; van Balkom, T.; van Wingen, G.; Booij, J.; Weintraub, D.; Berendse, H. W.; van den Heuvel, O. A.; Vriend, C.
Show abstract
BackgroundImpulse control disorders (ICD) in Parkinsons disease (PD) patients mainly occur as adverse effects of dopamine replacement therapy. Despite several known risk factors associated with ICD development, this cannot yet be accurately predicted at PD diagnosis. ObjectivesWe aimed to investigate the predictability of incident ICD by baseline measures of demographic, clinical, dopamine transporter single photon emission computed tomography (DAT-SPECT), and genetic variables. MethodsWe used demographic and clinical data of medication-free PD patients from two longitudinal datasets; Parkinsons Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) (n=311) and Amsterdam UMC (n=72). We extracted radiomic and latent features from DAT-SPECT. We used single nucleotic polymorphisms (SNPs) from PPMIs NeuroX and Exome sequencing data. Four machine learning classifiers were trained on combinations of the input feature sets, to predict incident ICD at any follow-up assessment. Classification performance was measured with 10x5-fold cross-validation. ResultsICD prevalence at any follow-up was 0.32. The highest performance in predicting incident ICD (AUC=0.66) was achieved by the models trained on clinical features only. Anxiety severity and age of PD onset were identified as the most important features. Performance did not improve with adding features from DAT-SPECT or SNPs. We observed significantly higher performance (AUC=0.74) when classifying patients who developed ICD within four years from diagnosis compared with those tested negative for seven or more years. ConclusionsPrediction accuracy for later ICD development, at the time of PD diagnosis, is limited; however, it increases for shorter time-to-event predictions. Neither DAT-SPECT nor genetic data improve the predictability obtained using demographic and clinical variables alone.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Time perception reflects individual differences in motor and non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease 95%
- Predicting Longitudinal Disease Severity for Individuals with Parkinson's Disease using Functional MRI and Machine Learning Prognostic Models 94%
- Effect of Eight-Week Online Cognitive Training in Parkinson’s Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A neuroimaging measure to capture heterogeneous patterns of atrophy in Parkinson’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies 94%
- Cognitive and Motor Correlates of Grey and White Matter Pathology in Parkinsons Disease 93%
- Neural Correlates of Impulsive Compulsive Behaviors in Parkinson’s Disease: A Japanese Retrospective Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Parkinson’s Progression Markers Initiative: A Milestone-Based Strategy to Monitor PD Progression 94%
- Amplification parameters of the alpha-synuclein seed amplification assay on CSF predict the clinical subtype of Parkinson's Disease at 10-year follow-up 94%
- Prospective role of PAK6 and 14-3-3 gamma as biomarkers for Parkinson's disease 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.