Back

Prediction of impulse control disorders in Parkinson's disease: a longitudinal machine learning study

Vamvakas, A.; van Balkom, T.; van Wingen, G.; Booij, J.; Weintraub, D.; Berendse, H. W.; van den Heuvel, O. A.; Vriend, C.

2025-06-05 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2025.06.04.25328442 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundImpulse control disorders (ICD) in Parkinsons disease (PD) patients mainly occur as adverse effects of dopamine replacement therapy. Despite several known risk factors associated with ICD development, this cannot yet be accurately predicted at PD diagnosis. ObjectivesWe aimed to investigate the predictability of incident ICD by baseline measures of demographic, clinical, dopamine transporter single photon emission computed tomography (DAT-SPECT), and genetic variables. MethodsWe used demographic and clinical data of medication-free PD patients from two longitudinal datasets; Parkinsons Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) (n=311) and Amsterdam UMC (n=72). We extracted radiomic and latent features from DAT-SPECT. We used single nucleotic polymorphisms (SNPs) from PPMIs NeuroX and Exome sequencing data. Four machine learning classifiers were trained on combinations of the input feature sets, to predict incident ICD at any follow-up assessment. Classification performance was measured with 10x5-fold cross-validation. ResultsICD prevalence at any follow-up was 0.32. The highest performance in predicting incident ICD (AUC=0.66) was achieved by the models trained on clinical features only. Anxiety severity and age of PD onset were identified as the most important features. Performance did not improve with adding features from DAT-SPECT or SNPs. We observed significantly higher performance (AUC=0.74) when classifying patients who developed ICD within four years from diagnosis compared with those tested negative for seven or more years. ConclusionsPrediction accuracy for later ICD development, at the time of PD diagnosis, is limited; however, it increases for shorter time-to-event predictions. Neither DAT-SPECT nor genetic data improve the predictability obtained using demographic and clinical variables alone.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.4%
2
Movement Disorders
62 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.3%
3
Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.8%
5
npj Parkinson's Disease
89 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.2%
6
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
8
Neurology Genetics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
10
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
11
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
12
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
14
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
15
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
17
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
18
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
19
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
20
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
Journal of Parkinson's Disease
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
22
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
27
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
28
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%