Back

Improved EPR sensitivity for aqueous biological samples using low-volume multi-channel cells and dielectric resonators

Mett, R. R.; Anilkumar, A.; Garces, A. M.; Wehrley, J. T.; Klug, C. S.; Lerch, M. T.; Sidabras, J. W.

2025-06-07 biophysics
10.1101/2025.06.03.657726 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Reducing sample volumes for electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy applications places increasing demands on hardware design to preserve or enhance EPR signal intensity. In this work, the design, fabrication, and testing of dielectric resonators and multi-channel aqueous sample cells for applications in X-band (nominally 9.5 GHz) EPR is presented. Our aim was to maximize the EPR signal intensity for sample sizes of 3-4 L and 200 nL. These advances are summarized as follows: single-crystal sapphire and rutile dielectric resonators with very low loss tangent and high resonator efficiency; minimum dielectric resonator coupling to radiation shield to reduce ohmic losses; 3D printed aqueous sample cells with thin multi-channel construction to minimize radio-frequency dissipation in the sample; and a Gordon coupler for maximum coupling range and minimum stored energy to eliminate frequency shifts during tuning. Sample cell geometries were designed by leveraging insights gained from analytic theory to inform finite-element modeling of electromagnetic fields. Experimental comparisons of multi-channel sample cells using a sapphire resonator exhibited a 2.2-fold increase in EPR signal intensity compared with a standard capillary at 3-4 L, while simulations predict an additional 23% improvement with further 3D printing advances. For samples at 200 nL, a rutile dielectric resonator with a multi-channel sample cell was simulated to improve EPR sensitivity by a 2.7-fold increase compared with a capillary at the same volume.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.