Sociodemographic and Mental Health Predictors of Mental Health Service Use Across Provider Types
Pang, N.; Yeung, J.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo examine trends in mental health service use across four provider types (family doctors, psychiatrists, psychologists, and social workers) and identify sociodemographic predictors of provider-specific access in Canada MethodsThis study used data from seven cycles (2007-2020) of the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS), a nationally representative cross-sectional survey. Trends over time were examined using weighted proportions and counts of service users. Multivariable logistic regression models were conducted on the 2019-2020 cycle to assess associations between sociodemographic factors and provider-specific service use. Analyses were weighted and adjusted for sex, age, income, education, visible minority status, immigrant status, Aboriginal identity, and self-perceived health. ResultsFamily doctors were consistently the most accessed providers for mental health concerns, followed by psychologists and social workers, with psychiatrists being least accessed. Psychologist and social worker use increased between 2017 and 2019. In regression models, women had significantly higher odds of using family doctors and social workers, while older adults had greater odds of accessing family doctors and lower odds of accessing psychologists and social workers. Higher education was associated with increased psychologist use, whereas lower income and education were linked to family doctor and social work use. Non-Indigenous individuals had higher odds of seeing a psychologist, and those not identifying as a visible minority had higher odds of seeing a family doctor. Poorer perceived mental health was a strong predictor of accessing all provider types. ConclusionsThis study reveals a stratified mental health care system in Canada, where sociodemographic factors shape who accesses which providers. While primary care dominates, growth in psychologist and social worker use suggests shifting patterns of engagement. Findings underscore the need for policies that address financial and structural barriers, promote equitable access, and expand coverage for community-based mental health providers.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- While they wait: A cross-sectional survey on wait times for mental health treatment for anxiety and depression for Australian adolescents 95%
- Exploring High Mortality Rates Among People With Multiple And Complex Needs: A Qualitative Study Using Peer Research Methods 93%
- “When will this end? Will it end?” The impact of the March-June 2020 UK Covid-19 lockdown response on mental health: a longitudinal survey of mothers in the Born in Bradford study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Service user perspectives of community mental health services for people with complex emotional needs: a co-produced qualitative interview study 93%
- A qualitative meta-synthesis of service users’ and carers’ experiences of assessment and involuntary hospital admissions under mental health legislations: a five-year update 93%
- Implementing an Advance Choice Documents resource for Black African and Caribbean people with experience of compulsory psychiatric admission 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mental health services implementation in Colombia – a systematic review 93%
- Awareness, utility and preferences of campus-based mental health services at tertiary institutions in Harare Zimbabwe: a cross-sectional study. 92%
- Assessing the approach to perinatal mental health screening and treatment in maternal-child health clinics in Western Kenya 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The treatment gap for mental disorders in adults enrolled in HIV treatment programs in South Africa: A cohort study using linked electronic health records 93%
- Uncovering Survivorship Bias in Longitudinal Mental Health Surveys 91%
- Mental health problems in the general population during and after the first lockdown phase due to the SARS-Cov-2 pandemic: Rapid review of multi-wave studies 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.