Back

Understanding Demographic Disparities and Personal Barriers to Self-Care in the UK: Findings from the Living Self-Care Survey Study

El-Osta, A.; Al Ammouri, M.; Altalib, S.; Smith, P. S.

2025-06-03 public and global health
10.1101/2025.06.01.25328757 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundUnderstanding how people manage everyday health challenges is vital for developing self-care policies that are inclusive, equitable and effective. Little is known about how demographic characteristics shape self-care confidence, symptom management strategies and health-seeking behaviours across the UK adult population. ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to examine the demographic predictors of self-care engagement among UK adults, focusing on self-care confidence, health information-seeking behaviours, symptom management strategies and perceived barriers to self-care. MethodsA cross-sectional online survey collected data from 3,255 UK adults, including a subset of health and care professionals (HCPs) to assess self-care knowledge, confidence, practices and health information accessibility. Ordinal logistic regression was used to identify demographic predictors of self-care engagement. ResultsRegression analyses highlighted marked demographic disparities in self-care engagement. Older adults (65+) were significantly more confident in their self-care knowledge (aOR=3.22) and healthy lifestyle behaviours (aOR=2.96) yet were also more likely to seek health information. Males reported lower self-care confidence than females (aOR=0.79). Black British participants were more confident in self-care knowledge (aOR=1.99), but along with Asian British individuals, were significantly less likely to seek health information (aORs=0.56 and 0.70 respectively). People living with disabilities (aOR=0.69) and long-term conditions (aOR=0.76) reported lower confidence across self-care domains. HCPs consistently reported higher self-care confidence (aOR=1.51, p=0.006) and health behaviour engagement (aOR=1.66). Financial constraints (53%), lack of time (47%) and low self-efficacy (22%) emerged as key barriers to self-care, alongside low use of pharmacists (1.3%) and digital resources (9.7%). ConclusionThis study highlights demographic disparities in self-care confidence, information-seeking behaviours and barriers to engagement, urging the need for tailored self-care interventions. Future research should explore interventions to improve health literacy, enhance pharmacist-led self-care support and promote equitable access to digital health resources are essential for optimizing self-care engagement across diverse population groups.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.