Physician-level classification performance across multiple imaging domains with a diagnostic medical foundation model and a large dataset of annotated medical images
Thieme, A. H.; Miri, T.; Marra, A. R.; Kobayashi, T.; Rodriguez-Nava, G.; Li, Y.; Barba, T.; Er, A. G.; Benzler, J.; Gertler, M.; Riechers, M.; Hinze, C.; Zheng, Y.; Pelz, K.; Nagaraj, D.; Chen, A.; Loeser, A.; Ruehle, A.; Zamboglou, C.; Alyahya, L.; Uhlig, M.; Machiraju, G.; Weimann, K.; Lippert, C.; Conrad, T.; Ma, J.; Novoa, R.; Moor, M.; Hernandez-Boussard, T.; Alawad, M.; Salinas, J. L.; Mittermaier, M.; Gevaert, O.
Show abstract
A diagnostic medical foundation model (MedFM) is an artificial intelligence (AI) system engineered to accurately determine diagnoses across various medical imaging modalities and specialties. To train MedFM, we created the PubMed Central Medical Images Dataset (PMCMID), the largest annotated medical image dataset to date, comprising 16,126,659 images from 3,021,780 medical publications. Using AI- and ontology-based methods, we identified 4,482,237 medical images (e.g., clinical photos, X-rays, ultrasounds) and generated comprehensive annotations. To optimize MedFMs performance and assess biases, 13,266 images were manually annotated to establish a multimodal benchmark. MedFM achieved physician-level performance in diagnosis tasks spanning radiology, dermatology, and infectious diseases without requiring specific training. Additionally, we developed the Image2Paper app, allowing clinicians to upload medical images and retrieve relevant literature. The correct diagnoses appeared within the top ten results in 88.4% and at least one relevant differential diagnosis in 93.0%. MedFM and PMCMID were made publicly available. FundingResearch reported here was partially supported by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) (R01 CA260271), the Saudi Company for Artificial Intelligence (SCAI) Authority, and the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action (BMWK) under the project DAKI-FWS (01MK21009E). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Generative AI Enables Medical Image Segmentation in Ultra Low-Data Regimes 96%
- STAIG: Spatial Transcriptomics Analysis via Image-Aided Graph Contrastive Learning for Domain Exploration and Alignment-Free Integration 95%
- PHARAOH: A collaborative crowdsourcing platform for PHenotyping And Regional Analysis Of Histology 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pretrained Patient Trajectories for Adverse Drug Event Prediction Using Common Data Model-based Electronic Health Records 93%
- Leveraging sequences missing from the human genome to diagnose cancer 93%
- Subpopulation-specific Machine Learning Prognosis for Underrepresented Patients with Double Prioritized Bias Correction 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.