Microbiota comparison of individual and pooled cow fecal samples from PEI dairy farms
Sanchez, J.
Show abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the microbiota diversity captured in individual versus pooled fecal samples from dairy cattle and evaluate the feasibility of using pooled sampling to assess the microbiota of dairy cattle at the herd level. A cross-sectional study used animals from 28 Prince Edward Island (PEI) dairy farms in Canada. The farms were visited between July and December 2020. Both free-stall and tie-stall housing systems were eligible. Manure samples from dry and lactating cows were obtained. Then, approximately 20g of fecal samples from each group were pooled. DNA extractions on all subsamples were performed using the Qiagen PowerMax Soil Kit and submitted for 16S rRNA gene amplification and sequencing. Operational taxonomic units were determined, and four alpha diversity indices were computed. A total of 128 and 132 manure samples from pos and prepartum cows, respectively, were analyzed. Mixed-effects random slope models were employed, incorporating herd-level random effects to estimate the correlation among individual samples and between individual and pooled samples. The estimated Shannon observed features, Pielou evenness and Faith PD were 5.9, 580, 0.93 and 44.1 from the individual and 5.93, 587, 0.93 and 45.5 from the pooled samples, respectively. All alpha diversity metrics were not significantly different between individual and pooled samples. Overall, pooled sampling does not significantly affect diversity and provides comparable results with individual samples, though it tends to show slightly higher diversity in some indices. This sampling strategy could be used in microbiota studies of dairy herds.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Validating the use of bovine buccal sampling as a proxy for the rumen microbiota using a time course and random forest classification approach 96%
- Reduced antibacterial drug resistance and blaCTX-M β-lactamase gene carriage in cattle-associated Escherichia coli at low temperatures, at sites dominated by older animals and on pastureland: implications for surveillance. 93%
- Increased microbial diversity and decreased prevalence of common pathogens in the gut microbiomes of wild turkeys compared to domestic turkeys 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of parity, blood progesterone, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory treatment on the dynamics of the uterine microbiota of healthy postpartum dairy cows 97%
- Beef cattle that respond differently to fescue toxicosis have distinct gastrointestinal tract microbiota 95%
- Rumen Sampling Methods Bias Bacterial Communities Observed 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Uncovering Changes in Microbiome Profiles Across Commercial and Backyard Poultry Farming Systems 94%
- Library Preparation and Sequencing Platform Introduce Bias in Metagenomic-Based Characterizations of Microbiomes 93%
- Fecal and skin microbiota of two rescued Mediterranean monk seal pups during rehabilitation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Whole-body Microbiota of Newborn Calves and Their Response to Prenatal Vitamin and Mineral Supplementation 96%
- Characterization of the microbiota associated with 12-week-old bovine fetuses exposed to divergent in utero nutrition 95%
- Exploring the phylogenetic diversity and antimicrobial activity of non-aureus staphylococci and mammaliicocci isolated from teat apices of organic dairy cows 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Persistent effects of intramammary ceftiofur treatment on the gut microbiome and antibiotic resistance in dairy cattle 97%
- Low-cost sample preservation methods for high-throughput processing of rumen microbiomes 94%
- Interactions between time on diet, antibiotic treatment, and liver abscess development on the fecal microbiome of beef cattle 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.