Back

CRISPR-Cas9 repair complexity in Drosophila melanogaster: NHEJ-induced deletions and HDR variability in the bantam microRNA gene

De Sousa, P.; Houbron, E.; Seitz, H.; Busseau, I.

2025-05-30 genetics
10.1101/2025.05.29.656857 bioRxiv
Show abstract

CRISPR-Cas9-mediated gene editing was used to generate specific mutants of the bantam gene in Drosophila melanogaster. To drive non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) and achieve a precise deletion of most of the bantam locus, two guide RNAs targeting sites 90 base pairs apart were expressed in the germline using the UAS/GAL4 system. Thirty lethal and eight viable lines were established and analyzed. One lethal line exhibited the expected 90 bp deletion, while the others carried diverse indels at one or both cleavage sites. Among the viable lines, seven harbored a single-nucleotide deletion that did not disrupt bantam function. Notably, one viable line, band1-44, carried a hypomorphic allele that reduced organismal size without affecting viability. To generate precisely edited bantam variants, CRISPR-Cas9-mediated homology-directed repair (HDR) was used using donor plasmids containing engineered mutations in the miRNA seed region, along with a scarless dsRED fluorescent marker. Approximately 40% of the resulting fluorescent lines were correctly edited, demonstrating the efficiency of this strategy for producing specific bantam variants. The remaining lines exhibited unexpected outcomes, among which partial HDR events, where the dsRED marker was integrated but not the bantam mutations, and full donor plasmid integrations, which led to duplication of the bantam locus. These findings reveal the complexity of CRISPR-Cas9 outcomes, emphasizing the need for thorough screening and characterization of individual candidates in gene-editing experiments. They also provide valuable insights for optimizing genome editing strategies. Article summaryThe authors used Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) gene editing to mutate the bantam microRNA in Drosophila melanogaster. They guided Non-Homologous End Joining to induce a precise 90 bp deletion. It was the rarest occurrence, while small inactivating indels occurred frequently. They employed Homology-Directed Repair using a fluorescent marker to specifically target the bantam seed region. This efficiently produced the intended mutations but also led to unexpected outcomes, including partial sequence replacements and full donor plasmid integrations. These results reveal the complexity of gene editing outcomes and highlight the importance of thorough molecular characterization in genome engineering experiments.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.5%
2
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
3
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.9%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.4%
6
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.6%
8
The CRISPR Journal
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
9
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
10
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.4%
11
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
12
Insect Molecular Biology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
13
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.1%
14
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.0%
16
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
18
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
19
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
20
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
21
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
22
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%