Back

Benchmarking Genomic Variant Calling Tools in Inbred Mouse Strains: Recommendations and Considerations

Garretson, A. C.; Blanco-Berdugo, L.; Roberts, A.; Dumont, B. L.

2025-05-31 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.05.28.656711 bioRxiv
Show abstract

With the growing affordability of whole genome sequencing, variant identification has become an increasingly common task, but there are many challenges due to both technical and biological factors. In recent years, the number of software packages available for variant calling has rapidly increased. Understanding the benefits and drawbacks of different tools is important in setting leading practices and highlighting limitations. These considerations are crucial in model organism research, as many variant calling programs assume outbred genomes and implicit heterozygosity, which may not apply to inbred laboratory models. Here, we present an analysis of variant calling tools and their performance in the simulated genomes of the C57BL/6J inbred laboratory mouse and nine non-reference laboratory strains. Our findings reveal a tradeoff between the recall and precision of tools. Balancing these considerations, we show that an optimal call set is obtained by using an ensemble approach, but specific variant calling recommendations vary by strain and analytical goals. Further, we highlight filters improving the performance of different variant calling tools, both for the discovery of rare variants and in the discovery of strain polymorphisms. In summary, our work provides best practices for calling and filtering genomic variants in inbred organisms, particularly laboratory mice. Article SummaryIdentifying mutations and rare genetic variants is a central task for modern genomics. Many computational tools exist for variant detection, but their performance varies across diverse applications. Further, few variant calling tools have been benchmarked against inbred genomes, which are commonly used for research. To address this, we evaluated five variant calling tools using simulated data from ten diverse inbred mouse strains. We show that variant detection, recall, and precision vary across tools and mouse strains, and that an ensemble approach improves confidence in detected mutations. Our findings offer a set of best practices for variant calling in inbred organisms across diverse analytical applications.

Published in GENETICS (predicted rank #3) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.