Mapping the trajectory of psychotic symptoms and their interaction with antipsychotic treatment: a longitudinal network intervention study
Sarti, P.; Cecere, G.; Edkins, V.; Omlor, W.; Blom, J. M. C.; Homan, P.
Show abstract
Antipsychotic efficacy in schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) is commonly evaluated using static measures that fail to capture the dynamic evolution of symptoms and the unfolding impact of treatment over time. Network Intervention Analysis (NIA) is a novel approach that models pharmacological treatments as active nodes within longitudinal symptom networks, capturing both direct and indirect treatment effects. This study aimed to investigate how the receptor-binding profile of antipsychotics influence symptom trajectories over six weeks. NIA was used to characterise the evolving impact of treatment with muscarinic antagonists, serotonergic/dopaminergic antagonists, and adrenergic agents with low dopaminergic antagonism within dynamic symptom networks. We hypothesised that NIA would reveal distinct patterns of symptom change, reflecting the pharmacodynamic mechanisms specific to each drug class. Forty-seven patients with SSD underwent baseline assessments including neuropsychological tests and five symptom rating scales from the Manual for the Assessment and Documentation of Psychopathology in Psychiatry (AMDP). They were then followed weekly for six additional weeks evaluating them with the AMDP-based symptom ratings, providing a comprehensive, standardised, and fine-grained measure of psychopathological changes. Muscarinic antagonists initially targeted self-disorder, then shifted to delusions, reducing symptom interconnectivity and increasing network resilience. Serotonergic/dopaminergic antagonists primarily influenced hallucinations but showed a late stage rebound, with increased network density and reduced treatment influence. Adrenergic agents exhibited a stabilising effect, preserving network structure with minimal symptom reduction. These findings demonstrate the utility of NIA in capturing the temporal dynamics of antipsychotic effects based on receptor affinity, supporting the development of phase-specific, network-informed, and personalised interventions.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Developmental Influences on Symptom Expression in Antipsychotic-Naive First-Episode Psychosis 95%
- Disentangling heterogeneity of psychosis expression in the general population: sex-specific moderation effects of environmental risk factors on symptom networks 95%
- Jumping To Conclusions, General Intelligence, And Psychosis Liability: Findings From The Multicentric EU-GEI Case-Control Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Moderate to severe negative symptoms predict low risk of symptoms worsening in schizophrenia patients in CATIE 96%
- Dopamine D1 receptor availability is not associated with delusional ideation measures of psychosis proneness 95%
- Characterizing the Relationship between Personality Dimensions and Psychosis-Specific Clinical Characteristics 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Differential sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor-1 protein expression in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex between schizophrenia Type 1 and Type 2 93%
- Antipsychotics Lower Peripheral Markers of Inflammation in Drug-naive Early Psychosis: A Pilot Study 93%
- Patients with affective disorders profit most from telemedical treatment: Evidence from a naturalistic patient cohort during the COVID-19 pandemic 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Interrelations Between Dopaminergic-, GABAergic- and Glutamatergic Neurotransmitters in Antipsychotic-Naïve Psychosis Patients and the Association to Initial Treatment Response 95%
- On the Proportion of Patients Who Experience a Prodrome Prior to Psychosis Onset - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 95%
- Cerebral cortical alterations in adolescent early-onset psychosis: a surface-based morphometry mega-analysis 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.