Back

Automated SP3 Workflow Enables Robust Sample Preparation on Proteonano Ultraplex Proteomics Platform

Wang, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Ouyang, X.; Wu, H.

2025-05-30 molecular biology
10.1101/2025.05.27.656469 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The efficiency and reproducibility of sample preparation are critical prerequisites for obtaining reliable results in bottom-up proteomics. To conclude, we systematically evaluated three commonly used sample preparation methods: automated single-pot solid-phase-enhanced sample preparation (SP3), precipitation by organic solvents, and filter-aided sample preparation method (FASP). When processing varying input amounts of HeLa cell lysate (10, 20, 50, 100, and 150 g), the SP3 method demonstrated strong linearity (R2 = 0.95), indicating excellent quantitative consistency across a broad protein input range. A comparison between manual SP3 and manual precipitation protocols revealed comparable protein identification numbers, with a correlation coefficient of approximately 0.97. We further developed an automated version of the SP3 method based on the Proteonano Ultraplex Proteomics platform (autoSP3), which yielded highly consistent results with the manual approach, achieving a protein identification overlap of 98.5% (6,949 out of 7,056). These findings support the suitability of the autoSP3 workflow as a robust and scalable approach for high-throughput and reproducible sample preparation in proteomics sample preparation.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.