Role of Chromosomal Microarray and RNA Fusion Analysis in Detecting KMT2A Partial Tandem Duplication with High Mortality in Myeloid Neoplasms: Retrospective Study
Shah, B. A.; Pei, J.; Abdelmessieh, P.; Francis, R.; Mackrides, N.; Wasik, M.; Nejati, R.
Show abstract
KMT2A partial tandem duplication (KMT2A-PTD) is a recurrent, high-risk alteration in myeloid neoplasms, yet no gold standard exists for its detection due to complex genomic architecture. We conducted a retrospective study of 97 specimens from 17 patients with KMT2A-PTD-positive myeloid neoplasms (11 AML, 4 MDS, 2 MPN) to compare chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and RNA fusion testing. Overall concordance was 73.3% ({kappa} = 0.467), with RNA fusion identifying more cryptic KMT2A-PTDs (p = 0.035), while CMA detected non-canonical KMT2A-PTDs and, additionally, secondary genomic abnormalities (e.g., trisomy 8 and CN-LOH of diverse genes). KMT2A-PTD cases exhibited high clonal complexity and distinct mutational profiles, including mutations of DNMT3A, TET2, ASXL1, RUNX1, FLT3, and others. Higher KMT2A-PTD transcript expression (split reads and SR/C ratio) correlated with DNMT3A, RUNX1, and FLT3 mutations, and RUNX1T1 copy number gain (p < 0.05), and was reduced in CN-LOH cases. RNA fusion consistently identified breakpoints at exon 10[->]2 or exon 11[->]2, affecting key oncogenic domains (CXXC, PHD finger, and bromodomain). Six-month overall survival was 41.2%, with HSCT significantly improving outcomes (68.6% vs. 0% at 17 months, p = 0.028), non-transplanted patients showing shorter median PFS ([~]6 months), and FLT3-mutated patients experiencing 100% mortality (p = 0.0456). In conclusion, CMA and RNA fusion analyses offer complementary diagnostic value in KMT2A-PTD-positive myeloid neoplasms. Such integrated genomic testing improves detection and refines risk stratification. Given the poor prognosis associated with KMT2A-PTD, especially in patients with co-occurring high-risk mutations, our findings support early consideration of HSCT in such patients.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Monosomy 7/del(7q) Cause Sensitivity to Inhibitors of Nicotinamide Phosphoribosyltransferase in Acute Myeloid Leukemia 95%
- Serum Flt3 ligand is a biomarker of progenitor cell mass and prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia 94%
- Molecular mechanisms promoting long-term cytopenia after BCMA CAR-T therapy in Multiple Myeloma 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of the IMPEDE VTE Score for Prediction of Venous Thromboembolism in Multiple Myeloma: A Retrospective Cohort Study 92%
- Exploring the role of Large Language Models (LLMs) in hematology: a systematic review of applications, benefits, and limitations 89%
- Thromboembolic risk in lung cancer patients receiving systemic therapy 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Real World Predictors of Response and 24-month survival in high-grade TP53 -mutated Myeloid Neoplasms 95%
- High WEE1 expression is independently linked to poor survival in multiple myeloma 93%
- CREBBP and STAT6 co-mutation and 16p13 and 1p36 loss define the t(14;18)-negative diffuse variant of follicular lymphoma 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mutated clones driving leukemic transformation are already detectable at the single cell level in CD34-positive cells in the chronic phase of primary myelofibrosis 93%
- Multimodal Spatial Proteomic Profiling in Acute Myeloid Leukemia 92%
- Genetic and Epigenetic Characterization of Sarcoma Stem Cells Across Subtypes Identifies EZH2 as a Therapeutic Target 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- DEK::NUP214 acts as an XPO1-dependent transcriptional activator of essential leukemia genes 94%
- Clinical Impact of Panel Based Error Corrected Next Generation Sequencing versus Flow Cytometry to Detect Measurable Residual Disease (MRD) in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) 94%
- Mapping AML heterogeneity – multi-cohort transcriptomic analysis identifies novel clusters and divergent ex-vivo drug responses 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.