Prognostic Significance of CD8 T-cell Spatial Biomarkers in ER+ and ER- Breast Cancer
Walker, A. E.; Gao, X.; Wang, Q.; De la Cruz, G.; Li, D.; Perou, C. M.; Saltz, J.; Marron, J. S.; Hoadley, K. A.; Troester, M. A.
Show abstract
Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs) have been shown to be prognostic in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC), but are rarely considered in other subtypes, particularly estrogen receptor (ER) positive cancers (70-80% of breast cancers), due to lower TIL counts. However, the spatial proximity of lower abundance TILs has not been evaluated in relation to breast cancer prognosis. In this study, multiplex immunofluorescent-stained images were used to identify cell types based on cytokeratin (Ck), CD8, and FoxP3 expression. Using distance-based visual morphometry between epithelial and immune cells, we computed new metrics, proximity and consistency, which capture spatial relationships between Ck+ tumor cells and CD8+ T-cells. Prognostic significance of proximity and consistency were compared to lymphocyte counts using log-rank tests. Worse relapse-free survival (RFS) was observed for both ER+ and ER-breast cancers with low proximity and consistency of CD8+ cells. Among ER negative breast cancers, proximity had the highest RFS hazard ratio (HR 1.84, 95% CI [1.18,2.87]). Among ER positive participants, RFS hazard ratios for proximity and consistency were 2.04 (95% CI [1.39, 2.98]) and 1.82 (95% CI [1.23, 2.69]) respectively. These associations were stronger than those observed for lymphocyte count (HR 1.35, 95% CI [0.92,1.98], log-rank p-value = 0.13). These IF-derived spatial metrics were also associated with established TILs metrics and RNA-based expression-based measures of tumor adaptive immune response. The prognostic significance of proximity in ER+ breast cancer implies that spatial parameters may identify individuals who would benefit from immune therapy; up to 75% of breast cancers experience T-cell proximity suggestive of immune susceptibility.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Clustering of HR+/HER2- breast cancer in an Asian cohort is driven by immune phenotypes 96%
- Immune gene expression profiling reveals heterogeneity in luminal breast tumors 94%
- Mutational landscape of pure ductal carcinoma in situ and associations with disease prognosis and response to radiotherapy 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- RNA Sequencing-Based Single Sample Predictors of Molecular Subtype and Risk of Recurrence for Clinical Assessment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer 95%
- The clinical and molecular significance associated with STING signaling in estrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer 94%
- Unmasking the tissue microecology of ductal carcinoma in situ with deep learning 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- NDRG1 expression is an independent prognostic factor in inflammatory breast cancer 94%
- Protein profiling of breast carcinomas reveals expression of immune-suppressive factors and signatures relevant to patient outcome 94%
- Use of high-plex data reveals novel insights into the tumour microenvironment of clear cell renal cell carcinoma 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinicogenomic characterization of inflammatory breast cancer 94%
- Clinical Validation of Digital PCR-based ctDNA detection for risk stratification in residual triple negative breast cancer: TRICIA trial results 93%
- High-dimensional and spatial analysis reveals immune landscape dependent progression in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Tumor-agnostic transcriptome-based classifier identifies spatial infiltration patterns of CD8+ T cells in the tumor microenvironment and predicts clinical outcome in early- and late-phase clinical trials 94%
- Reversible Downregulation of HLA Class I in Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma 94%
- A Spatial Comparison of Molecular Features Associated with Resistance to Pembrolizumab in BCG Unresponsive Bladder Cancer 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.