Effects of the 2019 Mexican health system reform on the Decision-Making Space of federal entities for breast cancer care.

BackgroundSince 2019, the Mexican health system has undergone a reform aimed at centralizing service provision for the population without social security, replacing the Social Protection System in Health with the decentralized public body IMSS-Bienestar. This operates under two schemes: "adhered" entities, with federal management, and "non-adhered" entities, under state administration. The reform has reshaped intergovernmental relations, affecting local decision-making authority, particularly in the care of chronic diseases such as breast cancer. ObjectiveTo analyze the effects of the 2019 Mexican health system reform on decision-making spaces for breast cancer care across states according to their model of adherence. MethodologyA comparative analysis of decision-making spaces before and after the reform was conducted using Bosserts Decision Spaces framework. This involved document review and interviews with key stakeholders in one adhered state (Mexico City) and one non-adhered state (Jalisco), using breast cancer as a case. ConclusionsA trend toward centralization was identified, with varying effects depending on the adherence model. In Mexico City, as an adhered entity, centralization encompassed multiple functions, whereas in Jalisco, a non-adhered entity, changes were limited to issues related to service fees and benefit packages. In Mexico City, discrepancies were identified between the de jure and de facto decision-making spaces. Further implementation studies are recommended to explore these discrepancies between formally delegated authority and authority effectively exercised, as well as research linking these spaces to performance and impact indicators, according to the adherence model.