Back

Whole-Genome Sequencing is a Viable Replacement for Chromosomal Microarray and Fragile X PCR Testing

Gao, Y.; South, S. T.; Cain, C. C.; Cox, J. L.; Fleharty, M.; Hilton, B. A.; Larkin, K.; Li, G.; Marsh, D. W.; Popic, V.; Toydemir, R. M.; Hofherr, S.; Lennon, N.; Bui, P.

2025-05-25 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2025.05.24.25328260 medRxiv
Show abstract

Developmental disabilities and congenital anomalies are common pediatric conditions that often require extensive genetic testing to determine an underlying cause. Traditionally, chromosomal microarrays (CMA) and Fragile X testing have served as first-tier diagnostics, but these tests are limited in scope and often necessitate follow-up sequencing assays. Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) offers a single, comprehensive assay capable of detecting a broad spectrum of genetic variation, including single nucleotide variants (SNVs), insertions and deletions (INDELs), copy number variants (CNVs), structural variants (SVs), loss of heterozygosity (LOH), and tandem repeat alterations. In this study, we evaluated whether WGS could replace CMA and serve as a more effective first-tier test. WGS achieved a 97.28% concordance with CMA for clinically relevant CNVs and LOH, while also offering more accurate breakpoint resolution and broader data point coverage. Notably, 4 out of 5 discordant cases (80%) were due to WGS providing more accurate breakpoint resolution. WGS covered over 97% of clinically relevant regions for CNV detection, compared to < 3% with CMA. To address the interpretive burden associated with the increased CNV calls, we implemented a cohort-based occurrence filter that successfully prioritized potential pathogenic events without sacrificing clinical sensitivity. Additionally, we assessed the feasibility of Fragile X screening from WGS data using a custom PCR confirmation logic built on Expansion Hunter output. This approach accurately excluded normal-range alleles and flagged indeterminate or expanded alleles for follow-up PCR confirmation. Our results support the use of WGS as a scalable and comprehensive diagnostic platform capable of consolidating multiple traditional assays. By streamlining workflows and enhancing clinical resolution, WGS offers a compelling alternative to the current diagnostic paradigm for patients with suspected genetic disorders.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.5%
2
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.5%
3
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 12%
7.2%
5
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
7
Genetics in Medicine Open
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Human Mutation
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
10
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
BMC Medical Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
12
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
14
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.9%
16
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
17
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
18
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
19
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
20
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
22
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.7%
23
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
24
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
25
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%