Whole-Genome Sequencing is a Viable Replacement for Chromosomal Microarray and Fragile X PCR Testing
Gao, Y.; South, S. T.; Cain, C. C.; Cox, J. L.; Fleharty, M.; Hilton, B. A.; Larkin, K.; Li, G.; Marsh, D. W.; Popic, V.; Toydemir, R. M.; Hofherr, S.; Lennon, N.; Bui, P.
Show abstract
Developmental disabilities and congenital anomalies are common pediatric conditions that often require extensive genetic testing to determine an underlying cause. Traditionally, chromosomal microarrays (CMA) and Fragile X testing have served as first-tier diagnostics, but these tests are limited in scope and often necessitate follow-up sequencing assays. Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) offers a single, comprehensive assay capable of detecting a broad spectrum of genetic variation, including single nucleotide variants (SNVs), insertions and deletions (INDELs), copy number variants (CNVs), structural variants (SVs), loss of heterozygosity (LOH), and tandem repeat alterations. In this study, we evaluated whether WGS could replace CMA and serve as a more effective first-tier test. WGS achieved a 97.28% concordance with CMA for clinically relevant CNVs and LOH, while also offering more accurate breakpoint resolution and broader data point coverage. Notably, 4 out of 5 discordant cases (80%) were due to WGS providing more accurate breakpoint resolution. WGS covered over 97% of clinically relevant regions for CNV detection, compared to < 3% with CMA. To address the interpretive burden associated with the increased CNV calls, we implemented a cohort-based occurrence filter that successfully prioritized potential pathogenic events without sacrificing clinical sensitivity. Additionally, we assessed the feasibility of Fragile X screening from WGS data using a custom PCR confirmation logic built on Expansion Hunter output. This approach accurately excluded normal-range alleles and flagged indeterminate or expanded alleles for follow-up PCR confirmation. Our results support the use of WGS as a scalable and comprehensive diagnostic platform capable of consolidating multiple traditional assays. By streamlining workflows and enhancing clinical resolution, WGS offers a compelling alternative to the current diagnostic paradigm for patients with suspected genetic disorders.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Third Generation Cytogenetic Analysis (TGCA): diagnostic application of long-read sequencing. 96%
- Clinical Validation and Diagnostic Utility of Optical Genome Mapping in Prenatal Diagnostic Testing 95%
- Concordance of whole-genome long-read sequencing with standard clinical testing for Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating Genome Sequencing Strategies: Trio, Singleton, and Standard Testing in Rare Disease Diagnosis 95%
- Genome-Wide Sequencing as a First-Tier Screening Test for Short Tandem Repeat Expansions 94%
- Multi-modal investigation of the schizophrenia-associated 3q29 genomic interval reveals global genetic diversity with unique haplotypes and segments that increase the risk for non-allelic homologous recombination 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reducing Sanger Confirmation Testing through False Positive Prediction Algorithms 95%
- The Importance of Automation in Genetic Diagnosis: Lessons from Analyzing an Inherited Retinal Degeneration Cohort with the Mendelian Analysis Toolkit (MATK) 94%
- One in seven pathogenic variants can be challenging to detect by NGS: An analysis of 450,000 patients with implications for clinical sensitivity and genetic test implementation 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exome sequencing as a first-tier test for copy number variant detection : retrospective evaluation and prospective screening in 2418 cases 96%
- Single-molecule optical mapping enables quantitative measurement of D4Z4 repeats in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) 94%
- Assessing performance of pathogenicity predictors using clinically-relevant variant datasets 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.