"What matters in help-seeking and disclosure intent of intimate partner violence during the COVID-19 pandemic:Similarities and differences across demographic groups"
Palantza, C.; Davis, M.; Witteveen, A. B.; Padilla Medina, D. M.
Show abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic increased Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) rates internationally and disrupted health services. Physical health concerns were prominent due to the direct impact of IPV. However, beyond physical injuries the pandemic also exacerbated other risk factors linked to IPV, such as deteriorating mental health, which can further hinder help-seeking for IPV. As access to health care services became more restricted, those experiencing IPV faced even greater barriers to help-seeking. No study has examined the factors related to IPV help-seeking intent during the earliest stage of the pandemic; therefore, the aim of this study was: To examine the comparative impact of the COVID-19 burden and health factors on IPV help-seeking and disclosure intent using quantitative data. A cross-sectional survey, named The Health and IPV Study (HIPVS) was conducted in the USA in April 2020. Among other health-related constructs, HIPVS assessed historical, recent, and current health status (mental and physical), IPV (victimization and perpetration), IPV help-seeking and disclosure intent. Subgroup analyses were done by gender, age and income level. Generalized Linear Mixed Effects models were used (N=1346). Number of COVID-19 cases and PTSD symptomology predicted higher help-seeking intent, but experience of violence correlated with lower disclosure intent. There were significant differences among demographic groups and inconsistency in the reporting of violence was a notable issue. The findings on mental health support the knowledge in existing literature. The most important limitation was the phrasing of the questions, particularly those which focused on intent instead of behavior. Mental and medical healthcare providers should prioritize IPV screening. Access to care should be maximized through continued improvement/expansion of online service provision and changes in healthcare policy that remove barriers (such as lapse in medical insurance coverage or financial burden).
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Body image and appearance distress among military veterans and civilians with an injury-related visible difference: A comparison study 96%
- Emotion regulation and cognitive function as mediating factors for the association between lifetime abuse and risky behaviors in women of color 96%
- Stress, coping, and quality of life in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- “ A Man Never Cries ”: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Gender Differences in Depression and Alcohol Use in Moshi, Tanzania 95%
- Correlates of behavioral and emotional disorders among school-going adolescents in Uganda 95%
- Prevalence of Social Anxiety Disorder and its associated factors among Foreign-born Undergraduate Students in Türkiye: A Cross-Sectional Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Health Needs Assessment: Development of a Simplified Risk Probability Scale (SRPS) Design for Rapid Mental Health Screening in Emergency Frontline Rescue Teams 93%
- Time trends of mental health indicators in Germany’s adult population before and during the COVID-19 pandemic 92%
- How different pre-existing mental disorders and their co-occurrence affects clinical outcomes of COVID-19? A study based on real-world data in the Southern United States 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association between sexual violence and depression is mediated by perceived social support among female University students in the Kingdom of Eswatini 96%
- Global Measurement of Physical Intimate Partner Violence to Monitor Sustainable Development Goal 5 94%
- Capability impacts of the Covid-19 lockdown in association with mental well-being, social connections and existing vulnerabilities: an Austrian survey study 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.