Back

Exploring a digital health solution to collect and manage health-related needs for complex surgery patients: Mixed-methods study

Fareed, N.; Asgher, H.; Tsilimigras, D.; Chatzipanagiotou, O. P.; Catalano, G.; Hartwell, B.; Bolton, K.; Pawlik, T. M.

2025-05-25 health informatics
10.1101/2025.05.23.25328074 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPatients who undergo complex surgery often experience substantial burden of health-related needs (medical, social, and behavioral health). A closed loop digital solution could facilitate the collection and resolution of health-related needs by care team members for patients who undergo complex surgery. A digital solution may facilitate adherence to a clear treatment plan and concomitantly reduce surgical complications and readmissions associated with unmet health-related needs, which remain persistent challenges across health care settings. ObjectivesTo establish a set of user specifications for a digital solution to collect and manage health-related needs, specifically medical, social, and behavioral needs for patients who undergo complex surgery. MethodsWe applied the Double Diamond Framework and organized the study into two phases: (1) qualitative methods to discover patients and care team members perspectives on health-related needs; (2) participatory design sessions to gain feedback about ideal features of a digital solution. We supplemented both phases with analysis of electronic health record data. ResultsExtensive themes emerged from interviews with patients (n=20) and care team members (n=24), capturing their health-related and surgical experiences as well as desired features for a proposed digital solution. A subset of participants from Phase 1 (n=5 patients and n=9 care team members) provided feedback on preferred features, drawing from digital tools currently available in the electronic health record system at our academic medical center. Findings from the qualitative interviews and design sessions were corroborated with documentation in the electronic health record. ConclusionDigital solutions could provide a streamlined approach for collection and management of health-related needs in surgery, with the goal of addressing unmet needs and improving patient activation. This approach is critical to ensure patients, especially patients who undergo complex surgery, have positive health outcomes. We identified preferences for specific features in a proposed digital solution based on our systematic assessment that will inform future work.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.6%
2
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.2%
3
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
5
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.8%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
7
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
8
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
9
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.4%
10
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
11
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
12
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
14
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
15
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
16
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
17
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
18
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
21
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 75%
0.7%
22
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
23
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
24
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%