Back

Environmental Exposures and the Human Gut Resistome in Northwest Ecuador

Cotto, I.; Duran-Viseras, A.; Jesser, K. J.; Zhou, N.; Hemlock, C.; Alban, V.; Ballard, A. M.; Fagnant-Speratia, C. S.; Lee, G. O.; Hatt, J.; Royer, C.; Eisenberg, J. N.; Trueba, G.; Konstantinidis, K.; Levy, K.; Fuhrmeister, E.; ECoMiD Authorship Group,

2025-05-23 infectious diseases
10.1101/2025.05.23.25327954 medRxiv
Show abstract

Inadequate water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) infrastructure may increase exposure to antimicrobial resistance (AMR). In addition, close human-animal interactions and unregulated antibiotic use in livestock facilitate the spread of resistant bacteria. We used metagenomic sequence data and multivariate models to assess how animal exposure and WASH conditions affect the gut resistome and microbiome in 53 pregnant women and 84 children in Ecuador. Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and clinically relevant antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) were detected across all age groups, but the highest abundance was found in children compared to mothers. In mothers, higher animal exposure trended towards a higher number of unique ARGs compared to low animal exposure ({beta}= -5.58 [95% CI: -11.46, 0.29]) and was significantly associated with greater taxonomic diversity ({beta}= -1.29 [-1.96, -0.63]). In addition, mothers with sewer systems or septic tanks and piped drinking water had fewer unique ARGs ({beta}= -3.52 [-6.74, -0.30]) compared to those without, and mothers with longer duration of drinking water access had lower total ARG abundance ({beta}= -0.05 [-0.1, -0.01]). In contrast, few associations were observed in children, likely due to the dynamic nature of the gut microbiome during early childhood. Improving WASH infrastructure and managing animal exposure may be important in reducing AMR but could also reduce taxonomic diversity in the gut.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.